https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-941089b392 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-941089b392 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2021-941089b392 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-941089b392
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/netperf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #8 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks! I think %autochangelog is fine per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rpmautospec and it seems to work
properly in F34 for other packages I have. I'll have a look at those systemd
macros and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #7 from Petr Menšík ---
I just found in [1] that %{?systemd_ordering} might be useful without explicit
dependency. It would allow installation without systemd, but with correct order
if installed.
1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #6 from Petr Menšík ---
Wait.
Your package uses %systemd_post etc., but does not use %{?systemd_requires} to
require systemd during upgrades. It seems that case is well covered and it
makes sense to work even without systemd. Not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #4 from Davide Cavalca ---
Thanks! The disttag thing is a side effect of using rpmautospec:
https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/417 The texinfo thing looks like a
bug in fedora-review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
--- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík ---
I forgot also netperf.service systemd file should be provided for easy running
of netserver. It can be used also without it, but would simplify testing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982011
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
14 matches
Mail list logo
