https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Petr Vokac changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Jakub Kadlčík changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://github.com/indigo-d
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #35 from Steve Traylen ---
[fedora-review-service-build]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #34 from Steve Traylen ---
Sorry no its these:
https://vokac.fedorapeople.org/oidc-agent-4.3.2-1.el7.src.rpm
https://vokac.fedorapeople.org/oidc-agent.spec-4.3.2-1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Steve Traylen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #33 from Steve Traylen ---
Just looked into packaging this for Fedora and then found this - good.
Are these still the review candidates for Fedora:
https://vokac.fedorapeople.org/oidc-agent.spec-4.1.1-3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #32 from ha...@kit.edu ---
Thanks for pointing me to the JavaScript Docs.
Many distributions do not provide bootswatch themes newer than 3.3.x.
I have not fully understood the reason, except that the openstack web dashboard
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #31 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #30)
> Looking at [1] and at the libjs-bootswatch spec file, …
I found https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-XStatic-bootswatch already in
the distribution. It
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #30 from Ben Beasley ---
Hmm, I guess I failed to follow up here after
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994#c26 when my clibs-list
package was reviewed and I imported it into Fedora. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #29 from ha...@kit.edu ---
Hi There,
I found the time to package the dependency clibs/list. It now builds on
most distributions on copr.
- spec file:
https://git.scc.kit.edu/m-team/clibs-packaging/-/raw/main/list/beasley.spec
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Bug 1997994 depends on bug 2123950, which changed state.
Bug 2123950 Summary: Review Request: clibs-list - C doubly linked list
implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123950
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2123950
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #27 from Ben Beasley ---
https://github.com/clibs/list/pull/40#issuecomment-1230234757
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(code@musicinmybra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #25 from ha...@kit.edu ---
Ok; I've setup the accounts according to
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Joining_the_Package_Maintainers/
Username is marcvs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #24 from Petr Vokac ---
> Even if you want to be the primary maintainer of this package, since Petr
> Vocak submitted this review request, Petr is the only one who could request
> the dist-git repository after a successful review.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #23 from Ben Beasley ---
Created attachment 1899732
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1899732=edit
Preliminary spec file for clibs-list dependency
Waiting on upstream feedback in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #22 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to hardt from comment #21)
> I tried to package clibs/list, using this specfile[1]
> leading to this result[2]
>
> The problem is:
> error: Empty %files file
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #21 from ha...@kit.edu ---
I tried to package clibs/list, using this specfile[1]
leading to this result[2]
The problem is:
error: Empty %files file
/builddir/build/BUILD/list-master/debugsourcefiles.list
Empty %files file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #20 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to hardt from comment #13)
> > > for list I didn't find a package
> >
> > It can be packaged as a dependency.
>
> Who is supposed to do this?
> Is there a process, or will I (i.e. upstream) be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #19 from Fabio Valentini ---
Just be aware that whoever ends up maintaining the package also needs the
person who filed the review request, as that is checked before package
creation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #18 from Petr Vokac ---
Yes, I agree it would be better if this package is maintained by Marcus Hardt,
because he makes these packages for other distribution and he is directly in
touch with developers.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #17 from ha...@kit.edu ---
I think Petr is the packager, originally.
If Petr does not object, and if it's not adding much more overhead, I'd be fine
to become the fedora packager for oidc-agent
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #16 from Ben Beasley ---
(I guess that question was directed at the original reporter, Petr Vocak, since
they would be the one requesting the repository.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #15 from Ben Beasley ---
Are you already a Fedora packager, or are you in search of a sponsor?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #14 from Fabio Valentini ---
> I guess this Fedora spec file is kept in a different repository, to which the
> package maintainer has access?
> I'm not really sure how my interface to this is.
Yes, upon approval, every Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #13 from ha...@kit.edu ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #12)
> Thanks! I’ve skimmed your responses.
>
> > We've addressed this for debian, too. Essentially the packaged version is
> > too old for our requirements
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #12 from Ben Beasley ---
Thanks! I’ve skimmed your responses.
> We've addressed this for debian, too. Essentially the packaged version is too
> old for our requirements (5.1.3), which is not available on most
> distributions.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #11 from Ben Beasley ---
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #10)
> 1) Using conditionals for distros other than Fedora or EPEL is forbidden in
> Fedora .spec files:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||decatho...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #8 from ha...@kit.edu ---
Hi There,
I'm the debian packager of oidc-agent and a colleague of the developer. I'm
replying inline to help getting this package done. I also wrote the initial
specfile.
Whatever I report as "i have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #9 from ha...@kit.edu ---
I also removed the dependency on libsodium-static
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
--- Comment #6 from Petr Vokac ---
Sorry for such a big delay, I finally went through documentation and notes in
comment #3. Updated packages
https://vokac.fedorapeople.org/oidc-agent-4.3.2-1.el7.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Petr Vokac changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(vo...@fjfi.cvut.c |
|z)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Ben Cotton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bcot...@redhat.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Ben Beasley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@musicinmybrain.net
--- Comment #3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Hirotaka Wakabayashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hiw...@yahoo.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997994
Petr Vokac changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment
42 matches
Mail list logo
