https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-df0978b118 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c44783070f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-ae2e48b19f has been pushed to the Fedora 36 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fd907b5676 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fd907b5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c44783070f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c447830
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-ae2e48b19f has been pushed to the Fedora 36 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #31 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Andreas Schneider changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(a...@redhat.com) |
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #25 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fd907b5676 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fd907b5676
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fd907b5676 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fd907b5676
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System ---
FED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Ding-Yi Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(a...@redhat.com)
--
You ar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #23 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cepces
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #22 from Ding-Yi Chen ---
% fedpkg request-repo cepces 2097925
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/46229
% fedpkg request-branch --repo cepces f36
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/46230
% fedp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Andreas Schneider changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #21 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #20 from Andreas Schneider ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/dchen/to-be-reviewed/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04683125-cepces/cepces.spec
SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/dchen/to-be-rev
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Ding-Yi Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dc...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #19 from Ding-Yi Chen --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Andreas Schneider changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(dc...@redhat.com)
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #17 from Ding-Yi Chen ---
SPEC:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/dchen/to-be-reviewed/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04683125-cepces/cepces.spec
SRPM:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/dchen/to-be-reviewed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #16 from Andreas Schneider ---
The review tool complains that %{?_smp_mflags} is not used. make is called for
selinux, maybe you can turn it on there.
Also the requires should be in the form:
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Ding-Yi Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dc...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #15 from Ding-Yi Chen --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Andreas Schneider changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(dc...@redhat.com)
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Andreas Schneider changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|pfili...@redhat.com |a...@redhat.com
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Andreas Schneider changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|a...@redhat.com |pfili...@redhat.com
Keyw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Schneider ---
The %defattr can be removed, this is the default since rpm 4.4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schneider ---
The LICENSE file need to be install when any subpackage combination is
installed.
The "certmonger" subpackage needs:
Requires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-%{name}
And we need to move the license fi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schneider ---
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/dchen/to-be-reviewed/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04565611-cepces/cepces.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/dchen/t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #11 from Ding-Yi Chen ---
Ouch. Well
Without pull request 18 (0.3.5-3)
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/dchen/to-be-reviewed/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04560008-cepces/cepces.spec
https://download.copr.fedorainfraclo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schneider ---
The problem with PR 18 is that it is untested. I don't have the infrastructure
to test it, this is something David needs to do. He said he will test it early
July.
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #9 from Ding-Yi Chen ---
@andreas Packaging wise, I can just add pull request 18, given we already have
16, 17.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schneider ---
We might want to wait for https://github.com/openSUSE/cepces/pull/18 being
merged.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schneider ---
# Rename configuration files.
install -d -m 0755 %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/
install -m 644 %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/cepces.conf{.dist,}
rm -f %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/cepc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #6 from Ding-Yi Chen ---
(In reply to Rob Crittenden from comment #4)
> There are SELinux macros to simply the pre/post scripts. I'm not sure if
> you're future-proofing by support multiple variants but generally this is
> just t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #5 from Ding-Yi Chen ---
(In reply to Andreas Schneider from comment #3)
> It should be two lines:
>
> install -d -m 0755 path/to/dir
>
> install -m 0644 source dest
> install -m 0644 source dest
>
> This way you set correct pe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #4 from Rob Crittenden ---
There are SELinux macros to simply the pre/post scripts. I'm not sure if you're
future-proofing by support multiple variants but generally this is just
targeted. I'm assuming single value below.
This is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
Andreas Schneider changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|a...@redhat.com
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schneider ---
It should be two lines:
install -d -m 0755 path/to/dir
install -m 0644 source dest
install -m 0644 source dest
This way you set correct permissions to the directory and also files.
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #2 from Ding-Yi Chen ---
Addressed:
BuildRequires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-setuptools
...
should be:
BuildRequires: python3dist(setuptools)
===
> I w
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097925
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schneider ---
I think
BuildRequires: python%{python3_pkgversion}-setuptools
...
should be:
BuildRequires: python3dist(setuptools)
...
==
I would prefer if y
41 matches
Mail list logo
