Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #31 from Valent Turkovic 2010-11-21
06:26:47 EST ---
I managed to compile and run osm2go on Fedora 14 without issue
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #33 from Valent Turkovic 2010-11-21
06:50:16 EST ---
Ok, thank you for explaining.
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #32 from Fabian Affolter 2010-11-21
06:46:04 EST ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> I managed to compile and run osm2g
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #30 from Fabian Affolter 2010-11-21
04:23:10 EST ---
There is a patch or patches needed to get rid of the Maemo Map
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #29 from viji 2010-11-20 15:41:00 EST
---
will try to contact the requester, if he is busy will take over :)
--
C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #28 from Valent Turkovic 2010-11-20
15:25:56 EST ---
When will Fedora 14 package be ready?
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
viji changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #26 from Martin Gieseking 2010-09-01
08:18:21 EDT ---
Ah OK. Thanks for the clarification. I thought, the wizard di
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #25 from Fabian Affolter 2010-09-01
06:19:37 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> (In reply to comment #23)
> > At t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #24 from Martin Gieseking 2010-08-31
10:21:21 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> At the moment there is an issue w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #23 from Fabian Affolter 2010-08-30
17:46:20 EDT ---
At the moment there is an issue with the 'Wizard' because 'Mae
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #22 from Martin Gieseking 2010-08-15
11:34:55 EDT ---
Sorry, Fabian, I've still some things to nag about. :) But as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #21 from Fabian Affolter 2010-08-15
05:53:07 EDT ---
The new package with the new source.
Here are the new files:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #20 from Martin Gieseking 2010-07-03
12:38:35 EDT ---
The site was temporarily down but seems to be available again
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #19 from Fabian Affolter 2010-06-27
17:39:36 EDT ---
Can you please tell provide a link to the *maemo2.tar.gz sourc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #18 from Martin Gieseking 2010-06-15
14:10:39 EDT ---
Thanks for clarifying the license issue.
Please update the p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #17 from Fabian Affolter 2010-06-15
07:15:02 EDT ---
According to upstream everything is GPLv3+.
https://garage.ma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #16 from Fabian Affolter 2010-06-06
10:04:10 EDT ---
Unfortunately not. I will get in touch again with upstream.
h
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #15 from Martin Gieseking 2010-05-06
11:56:51 EDT ---
Fabian, did you already get any information about the license
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #14 from Valent Turkovic 2010-05-06
11:25:52 EDT ---
Cool, seams this packages will soon be in Fedora repos, jay!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2010-04-28
07:11:40 EDT ---
Thanks Martin your comments.
--
Configure bugmail: https://b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #12 from Martin Gieseking 2010-03-29
04:50:25 EDT ---
The package looks pretty clean to me. Nonetheless two further
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2010-02-09
04:39:42 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> isn't osm2go opensource? how come t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549
--- Comment #9 from Valent Turkovic 2010-01-10
16:47:34 EST ---
isn't osm2go opensource? how come they didn't release source co
26 matches
Mail list logo
