https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #29 from Eric Smi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #30 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla 2012-03-12 08:02:16 EDT
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System
2012-03-12 15:24:29 EDT ---
libbsd-0.3.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
Sebastian Dziallas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #16 from Sebastian Dziallas 2010-02-06
07:19:04 EST ---
* MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output sh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #17 from Eric Smith 2010-02-06 22:55:29 EST ---
In reviews of other packages, I've been told that whether man pages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
Sebastian Dziallas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
Eric Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-02-09 16:06:43 EST
---
CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System
2010-02-09 20:17:05 EST ---
libbsd-0.2.0-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for F
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System
2010-02-11 09:46:57 EST ---
libbsd-0.2.0-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #2 from Eric Smith 2010-01-29 05:40:54 EST ---
> you can safely drop the SOlib definitions.
OK
> Does the library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #4 from Eric Smith 2010-01-29 12:14:21 EST ---
> Actually, I feel this package is not really close to what it intend
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-01-29 23:24:57
EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > Actually, I feel this package is no
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #6 from Eric Smith 2010-01-30 04:36:11 EST ---
Regarding /usr/include/vis.h "adding a bsd-header to glibc", I strong
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #7 from Eric Smith 2010-01-30 04:40:41 EST ---
Cut-and-paste error. I wrote
> libbsd installs most of its headers i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius 2010-01-30 05:09:03
EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Regarding /usr/include/vis.h "adding
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #9 from Eric Smith 2010-01-30 05:30:03 EST ---
> It fails to do with nlist.h
I already moved nlist.h into /usr/incl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #11 from Eric Smith 2010-01-31 02:29:44 EST ---
> you'll probably want to use -isystem /usr/include/bsd rather than
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #12 from Kevin Kofler 2010-01-31 02:30:38
EST ---
And I don't see how /usr/include/vis.h and /usr/include/libutil.h
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #13 from Eric Smith 2010-01-31 02:38:03 EST ---
I don't mind having to change the includes a bit. In fact, I prefer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559856
--- Comment #14 from Eric Smith 2010-01-31 21:03:23 EST ---
Upstream states that nlist.h is a problem in Debian as well, and act
30 matches
Mail list logo
