Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #68 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-11-29 13:36:19 EST
---
OK, I've already run my checklist so this is
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #69 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-11-29 13:57:04 EST ---
I can say with authority that I'm as clueless as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #70 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-11-29 14:09:57 EST
---
Well, changing gcc to g++ on the make line
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #71 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-11-29 14:14:09 EST ---
I'm not seeing these rpmlint errors. I'm using
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #72 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-11-29 14:21:48 EST
---
You must install the package and then run
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #73 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-11-29 14:35:49 EST ---
Interesting, I was not aware of this rpmlint
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #74 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-11-29 14:47:16 EST ---
I changed the two gcc on line 74 to g++ and I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #75 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-11-29 14:53:29 EST
---
Well, obviously you'd only want to change the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #76 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-11-29 15:40:39 EST ---
Jackpot, that did it. It builds, no u-n-w-s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #79 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-11-29 19:06:28 EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #65 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-11-28 13:36:13 EST ---
Tibbs, ping? :)
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #67 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-11-28 15:01:46 EST ---
No worries, life happens. BTW, I've relocated the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Thom Carlin bugzilla.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #62 from Thom Carlin bugzilla.a...@gmail.com 2011-08-16 08:36:48
EDT ---
Asked Jon in 564522.
--
Configure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #63 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-08-16 21:50:53 EDT ---
Sorry for the delay, stuff happened. :/
Very
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #61 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-08-11 11:54:12 EDT
---
Note that I'm still on to review this,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #54 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-08-09
13:00:22 EDT ---
This package has a unique layout, it
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #55 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-08-09 13:08:03 EDT
---
I had completely forgotten about this.
From
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #56 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-08-09 13:12:47 EDT ---
Yes, and those don't work with UPX, which is the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #57 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-08-09
13:16:03 EDT ---
Is UPX using the C interface? I'd still
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #58 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-08-09 13:31:05 EDT ---
C and C++. I'd like that too. They don't seem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #59 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-08-09
15:47:19 EDT ---
Is upx the only consumer of this in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #60 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-08-09
16:04:48 EDT ---
So, the reason I ask that question in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #53 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-04-27 10:44:17 EDT ---
SRPM:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #52 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-12 15:20:19 EDT
---
Hmm, I'm not seeing any change in that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #51 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-04-11 14:03:37 EDT ---
SRPM:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #50 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-04-08 16:14:47 EDT
---
It doesn't appear that all of the issues were
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #47 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-04-05
13:31:16 EDT ---
Created attachment 490051
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #49 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-04-05 13:59:22 EDT ---
Fantastic, thank you, updated!
SRPM:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #45 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2011-04-04
15:18:22 EDT ---
Sent another email to Igor Pavlov today,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #46 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-04-04 15:27:23 EDT ---
Awesome, thanks!
--
Configure bugmail:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Thom Carlin bugzilla.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #40 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2011-01-27 14:24:23 EST
---
And it's looking like the answer is no, this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #41 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-01-27 14:49:34 EST ---
Bah. Thank you. Let me know the outcome. If
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #36 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-11-24 22:01:51 EST
---
Now, for another dumb question: are the later
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #37 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-11-24 22:16:37 EST
---
Actually,we can retire lzma packages in fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
--- Comment #38 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2010-11-24 23:46:36 EST ---
@Jason: I suppose we could go with lzma465-sdk,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596461
Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
47 matches
Mail list logo
