Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System
2011-01-04 15:58:56 EST ---
ibus-table-chinese-1.3.0.20101206-1.fc13 has been pushed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System
2010-12-17 03:38:17 EST ---
ibus-table-chinese-1.3.0.20101206-1.fc14 has been pushed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System
2010-12-05 21:19:35 EST ---
ibus-table-chinese-1.3.0.20101206-1.fc13 has been submitt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System
2010-12-05 21:19:23 EST ---
ibus-table-chinese-1.3.0.20101206-1.fc14 has been submitt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-03 09:04:06 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
Ding-Yi Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #14 from Peng Wu 2010-12-02 21:07:56 EST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Peng,
>
> You need click on "take" on the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
Peng Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #13 from Caius Chance 2010-12-02 20:05:46
EST ---
I misunderstood. I also dislike -all.
--
Configure bugmail: htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #12 from Ding-Yi Chen 2010-12-02 19:44:55 EST ---
In case you are interested, I've released a new version,
which re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #11 from Ding-Yi Chen 2010-12-02 19:01:18 EST ---
Peng,
You need click on "take" on the right of
"Nobody's workin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #10 from Ding-Yi Chen 2010-12-02 18:59:23 EST ---
Caius,
Thanks, but even with ibus-table-chinese-all, I still need
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-12-02 14:33:58 EST
---
This ticket is not assigned to anyone. It should be assigned to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #8 from Caius Chance 2010-12-01 08:36:23
EST ---
I support this. ibus-table-chinese as metapackage with ibus-table-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #7 from Chen Lei 2010-12-01 03:36:58 EST ---
I don't think ibus-table-chinese-all subpackage is necessary or useful,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
Ding-Yi Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
Peng Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
Peng Wu changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #4 from Ding-Yi Chen 2010-11-28 19:10:13 EST ---
Spec URL: http://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/ibus-table-chine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2010-06-27 22:08:02 EDT
---
Would it be better to subpackage some of the tables?
--
Configu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-05-27
00:39:43 EDT ---
*** Bug 579635 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
Caius 'kaio' Chance changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596593
--- Comment #2 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2010-05-27
00:40:06 EDT ---
*** Bug 579613 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug.
27 matches
Mail list logo
