Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2010-08-23 21:30:20 EDT ---
gdb-heap-0.5-1.fc14 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2010-08-18 21:18:23 EDT ---
gdb-heap-0.4-1.fc14 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2010-08-12 16:26:40 EDT ---
gdb-heap-0.5-1.fc14 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2010-08-06 11:15:07 EDT
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2010-08-06 13:17:40 EDT ---
gdb-heap-0.4-1.fc14 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #17 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-08-04 12:13:34 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #16)
Thanks.
The
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #14 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-08-03 16:41:05 EDT
---
I've updated the packaging based on this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #15 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-08-03 16:49:18 EDT
---
Note to self, until I figure out git tagging:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #11 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-07-30
09:05:44 EDT ---
Just to make sure I understand:
This
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #12 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-07-30 16:24:04 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #11)
Just to make sure
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #13 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2010-07-30
16:46:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
However,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #10 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-07-29 17:21:11 EDT
---
Updated specfile:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #3 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-07-27 09:19:10 EDT
---
My reasoning here is that gdb-heap uses the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #6 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-07-27 12:20:54 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #7 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-07-27 12:45:27 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #6)
Actually, Requires:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #8 from Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com 2010-07-27 12:58:44 EDT ---
Is it possible to read
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #9 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-07-27 13:18:11 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #8)
Is it possible to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618451
--- Comment #1 from Dave Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com 2010-07-26 19:34:42 EDT
---
Note: the
%global glibc_soversion
macro is
26 matches
Mail list logo
