https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1032867
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
Todd V. Rovito changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #36 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-12-24 06:44:08 EST
---
Yes, it's only about the data. I can't say anything about Bali
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
Balint Cristian changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
Balint Cristian changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
Balint Cristian changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #28 from Kevin Kofler 2011-01-31 16:52:08
EST ---
PS: If you want to change the value of M_PI in glibc to 3., you a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #27 from Kevin Kofler 2011-01-31 16:48:56
EST ---
While I do understand where they're coming from, this doesn't cha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #29 from Balint Cristian 2011-01-31
17:15:05 EST ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> PS: If you want to change the valu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #30 from Kevin Kofler 2011-01-31 17:27:03
EST ---
No. There are no exceptions to the legal guidelines.
You MAY be
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #31 from Balint Cristian 2011-02-01
10:21:03 EST ---
Hold a moment,
The real license of EPSG data (one what we ar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #32 from Balint Cristian 2011-02-01
11:00:31 EST ---
In the meanwhile we found more exactly (Web itself seems confu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #4 from Bill Nottingham 2010-08-10 16:10:43
EDT ---
LICENSE in the package appears to be out of date.
http://www.e
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2010-08-10 18:03:12 EDT
---
This does, however, beg the question of why this issue isn't doc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #6 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-08-10 18:36:57 EDT
---
I've contacted upstream about the license and they'll change th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2010-08-11
02:32:05 EDT ---
I don't know remember any more, however for the history of handli
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #8 from Martin Gieseking 2010-08-11
03:16:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The manpages in an rpm-package don'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #10 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-08-13 18:51:47 EDT
---
Shall I wait for upstream's revised license file or much rathe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #11 from Martin Gieseking 2010-08-14
07:29:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Shall I wait for upstream's revis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #12 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-08-14 08:50:05 EDT
---
Spec URL: http://geofrogger.net/review/libgeotiff.spec
SRPM UR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #14 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-08-16 15:07:30 EDT
---
Tom, can you explain why it is not?
--
Configure bugmail: ht
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-08-16
15:27:25 EDT ---
Clause 2 in the license restricts for-profit distribution.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #16 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-08-16 15:38:54 EDT
---
In my interpretation that refers to the standalone EPSG datase
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler 2010-08-16 21:58:10
EDT ---
Yeah, to me this sounds very much like the Artistic 2.0 and Bitst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-08-17
13:43:21 EDT ---
Red Hat Legal confirms that the current EPSG license (as f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #19 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-08-22 15:26:44 EDT
---
What can we do about it?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-08-23
08:35:50 EDT ---
Well, I would think the best bet would be to reach out to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #21 from Kevin Kofler 2010-08-23 10:49:38
EDT ---
Re modification, do we really need to apply the rules for code as
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #22 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2010-08-23
11:04:32 EDT ---
Strictly speaking no, but I would prefer if we had that ri
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #23 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-09-08 19:09:42 EDT
---
I just sent an e-mail to Abby Findlay, who is the secretary of
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=621416
--- Comment #25 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-10-07 06:11:46 EDT
---
Not that I knew.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redh
37 matches
Mail list logo
