Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Jason Tibbitts changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #4 from Damian Wrobel 2010-12-28
18:00:08 EST ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think, you should call make %{?_smp_
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #5 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-12-28 18:30:37 EST
---
.qm files can be created from .ts with Qt's lrelease, in case t
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #6 from Damian Wrobel 2010-12-29
03:20:37 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
>
> OK, BUILD_SHARED_LIBS is a Cmake fl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #7 from Volker Fröhlich 2010-12-29 14:46:10 EST
---
You are right, it therefore isn't necessary to have a shared li
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #8 from Damian Wrobel 2010-12-29
15:15:03 EST ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Volker, I have already a patch prepared
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Kevin Kofler changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler 2010-12-29 17:54:08
EST ---
In short:
* if you DON'T want to install your library for other p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #11 from Damian Wrobel 2010-12-30
04:52:10 EST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
I generally share this idea, but maybe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #12 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-13 21:04:07 EST
---
The licenses for the two convenience libraries are LGPL 2.1+.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #13 from Damian Wrobel 2011-01-17
07:57:37 EST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Do you see any other issues? I'd prefe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler 2011-01-17 11:32:19
EST ---
In CaptureThreadImplALSA.cpp, please change the hardcoded:
m_sou
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #15 from Kevin Kofler 2011-01-17 11:36:36
EST ---
(Well, I'm not sure whether it actually is user-settable or not,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #16 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-17 13:38:33 EST
---
[+] Good
[X] Needs work
[0] Does not apply
MUST:
=
[+] r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #18 from Damian Wrobel 2011-01-18
15:32:15 EST ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Preserve timestamps:
>
> install -D
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Volker Fröhlich changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #20 from Damian Wrobel 2011-01-27
17:33:32 EST ---
Volker,
Please find an updated version based on the qt4 as well
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #21 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-27 18:48:50 EST
---
Yes, works perfectly fine for me.
One thing I noticed though:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #22 from Damian Wrobel 2011-01-28
08:24:39 EST ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Yes, works perfectly fine for me.
Th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #23 from Volker Fröhlich 2011-01-29 17:39:38 EST
---
Thank you, please proceed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-31 11:48:48 EST
---
There are two issues with your request:
1) It is too early to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #26 from Damian Wrobel 2011-01-31
12:34:29 EST ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> There are two issues with your reque
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #27 from Kevin Kofler 2011-01-31 12:52:20
EST ---
The previously reviewed package never got imported, and it got or
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-01-31 13:46:46 EST
---
I've unretired the package and added the two new branches. Ple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #29 from Damian Wrobel 2011-01-31
15:13:38 EST ---
The f13 and f14 branches seems to be missing:
git branch -r
o
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #30 from Kevin Fenzi 2011-02-03 15:20:27 EST ---
Try now?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userpr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #31 from Damian Wrobel 2011-02-03
16:10:27 EST ---
Now it's ok, thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.re
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System
2011-02-24 15:28:28 EST ---
fmit-0.99.2-1.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System
2011-02-24 15:29:30 EST ---
fmit-0.99.2-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #34 from Damian Wrobel 2011-02-24
15:49:55 EST ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: fmit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Damian Wrobel changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #36 from Jason Tibbitts 2011-02-25 12:05:35 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System
2011-02-25 16:01:40 EST ---
Package fmit-0.99.2-1.fc15:
* should fix your issue,
* wa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System
2011-03-02 21:50:59 EST ---
fmit-0.99.2-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stabl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System
2011-03-05 17:56:29 EST ---
fmit-0.99.2-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stabl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System
2011-03-05 17:58:29 EST ---
fmit-0.99.2-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stabl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665995
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
47 matches
Mail list logo
