Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #89 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-30 14:40:39 EDT ---
frogr-0.6.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stabl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #88 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-14 18:24:57 EDT ---
frogr-0.6.1-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stabl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #86 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-27 15:37:04 EDT ---
frogr-0.6.1-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #85 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-27 15:36:54 EDT ---
frogr-0.6.1-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #84 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-26 05:50:22 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #82 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-25 16:11:02 EDT ---
Subject is capitalized, request is not, please make both the desired
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #80 from Mario Blättermann 2011-08-25 14:01:19
EDT ---
Many thanks for your review!
(In reply to comment #78)
> Th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #79 from Martin Gieseking 2011-08-25
11:24:15 EDT ---
A quick note:
%{_datadir}/%{name} is still unowned (see comm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Gianluca Sforna changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #77 from Mario Blättermann 2011-08-20 03:14:19
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #76)
> Here comes the 0.6.1 release:
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #76 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-08-19
10:40:43 EDT ---
Here comes the 0.6.1 release:
- The announcement (sent a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #75 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-08-18
11:44:53 EDT ---
As you wish, but as I said, I think it's very likely that
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #74 from Gianluca Sforna 2011-08-18 11:20:23 EDT
---
Once in the repositories, the package can be updated a number
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #73 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-08-18
08:44:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #72)
> [...]
> If »soon« means within
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #72 from Mario Blättermann 2011-08-18 08:18:01
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #71)
> So, I'll probably release 0.6.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #71 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-08-18
07:03:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #70)
> Sorry for the noise, the bug w
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #70 from Mario Blättermann 2011-08-18 06:19:13
EDT ---
Sorry for the noise, the bug was in my own system, see
https
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #69 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-08-16
17:32:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #68)
> Small problems with 0.6:
>
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #67 from Mario Blättermann 2011-08-16 14:40:58
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #66)
> Alberto Garcia is correct. All
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #66 from Rahul Sundaram 2011-08-16 11:54:05
EDT ---
Alberto Garcia is correct. All the patches in the current pack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Alberto Garcia changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #64 from Gianluca Sforna 2011-08-16 09:49:40 EDT
---
For the records, I tried to rebuild in mock the latest version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #63 from Alberto Garcia 2011-08-16 09:09:30
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #58)
> I think in debian they used the wor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Rahul Sundaram changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #61 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-08-13
05:08:25 EDT ---
Frogr 0.6 has been released today. Feel free to package it
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #60 from Christophe Fergeau 2011-07-19
07:59:22 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #59)
>
> After all, the new release
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #59 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-07-19
06:41:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #57)
> (In reply to comment #56)
> >
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #58 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-07-04
15:20:43 EDT ---
I think in debian they used the workaround of ensuring tha
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #57 from Mario Blättermann 2011-07-04 14:49:15
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #56)
> If you patch configure.ac or Mak
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #56 from Christophe Fergeau 2011-07-04
04:31:27 EDT ---
If you patch configure.ac or Makefile.am, you should add an
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #55 from Mario Blättermann 2011-07-03 11:09:23
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #54)
> Few fixes to do:
>
> 1. Missing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #54 from Gianluca Sforna 2011-07-01 07:05:55 EDT
---
Few fixes to do:
1. Missing a BR for intltool
2. debuginfo pa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Gianluca Sforna changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #52 from Martin Gieseking 2011-06-29
13:50:33 EDT ---
Since the reviewing process seems to have stalled, I asked To
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #51 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-29
05:41:59 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #50)
> I can't find any FPC request o
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Gianluca Sforna changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #49 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-09
07:02:30 EDT ---
Just wondering... is there any place where I can follow th
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #48 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-04
02:39:57 EDT ---
Created attachment 502955
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #47 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-03
18:33:51 EDT ---
Created attachment 502924
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.co
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #46 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-03
17:38:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #39)
> (In reply to comment #38)
[...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #45 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-03
17:09:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> [...]
> What does it mean for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #44 from Christophe Fergeau 2011-06-03
15:56:34 EDT ---
I'm fine with asking the FPC people, it just sounds like un
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #43 from Martin Gieseking 2011-06-03
15:39:41 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #42)
> These are some C files that are l
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #42 from Christophe Fergeau 2011-06-03
15:06:54 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> Yes, you should ask for an exce
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #41 from Martin Gieseking 2011-06-03
14:45:27 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> In any case, I would prefer a pro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #40 from Mario Blättermann 2011-06-03 14:12:45
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #39)
> > The question is: Do we have a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #39 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-03
13:26:22 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> (In reply to comment #35)
> >
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #38 from Martin Gieseking 2011-06-03
11:38:30 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #35)
> Here I disagree, LGPLv3 licensed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #37 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-03
11:32:15 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> [...]
> If putting a COPYING f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #36 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-03
11:07:21 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> I agree with Christophe that i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #35 from Christophe Fergeau 2011-06-03
10:42:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #34)
>
> In order to emphasize flickso
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #34 from Martin Gieseking 2011-06-03
10:22:36 EDT ---
I agree with Christophe that it shouldn't be a problem to bui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #33 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-03
08:47:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> I'm not sure I'd have made thi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #32 from Christophe Fergeau 2011-06-03
07:58:45 EDT ---
I'm not sure I'd have made this build system change to frog
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #31 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-02
17:12:55 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> [...]
> > If the FPC doesn't g
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #30 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-02
11:17:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> [...]
> I think you could also
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #29 from Martin Gieseking 2011-06-02
10:28:36 EDT ---
I ask on IRC how to handle this issue and got some helpful in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #28 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-02
06:05:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> I would keep src/flicksoup fil
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #27 from Christophe Fergeau 2011-06-02
05:54:13 EDT ---
I would keep src/flicksoup files as LGPLv3 if your long ter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #26 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-06-02
05:20:16 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> CFLAGS also defines some prepr
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #25 from Martin Gieseking 2011-06-02
03:21:33 EDT ---
Here are some further information on how to treat the bundled
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #24 from Martin Gieseking 2011-06-02
03:07:15 EDT ---
CFLAGS also defines some preprocessor constants (-DG_DISABLE_
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Jussi Lehtola changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #22 from Christophe Fergeau 2011-06-01
17:50:52 EDT ---
It's likely, make detects configure.ac is newer than config
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #21 from Mario Blättermann 2011-06-01 17:44:18
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> - You should drop the flags "-Wa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #20 from Mario Blättermann 2011-06-01 17:27:20
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> I cleared the fedora-review fla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #17 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-05-31
16:44:13 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> [...]
> Right. Currently, we s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #16 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-05-31
16:34:20 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> >
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #15 from Mario Blättermann 2011-05-31 16:12:14
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #12 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-05-31
15:52:16 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Many thanks for all the hints a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #13 from Christophe Fergeau 2011-05-31
15:52:47 EDT ---
Fwiw,
$ rpmlint frogr-0.5-2.fc15.src.rpm
frogr.src: W: sp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #14 from Christophe Fergeau 2011-05-31
15:54:23 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Don't you need to list there so
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #11 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-05-31
15:49:03 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Just tested Frogr 0.5. It start
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #10 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-05-31
15:43:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> [...]
> However, I'm unsure if
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #9 from Mario Blättermann 2011-05-31 15:20:39
EDT ---
Just tested Frogr 0.5. It starts with an empty window, althou
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #8 from Mario Blättermann 2011-05-31 14:57:44
EDT ---
Sorry, just pushed the wrong srpm link. The right one is:
SR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann 2011-05-31 14:56:08
EDT ---
Many thanks for all the hints and improvements! I've now crow
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #6 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-05-31
09:15:10 EDT ---
Breaking News:
As a result of a conversation in my blog [1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #5 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-05-30
15:40:38 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> [...]
> > As you can see, the fi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann 2011-05-30 14:49:08
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hmm.. I think you're doing somethi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #3 from Mario Sanchez Prada 2011-05-30
14:21:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> [...]
> > "Frogr is a small appl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann 2011-05-30 14:09:16
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> As the main developer of frogr so
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708765
Mario Sanchez Prada changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
93 matches
Mail list logo
