Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #67 from Fedora Update System ---
datalog-2.3-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #66 from John D. Ramsdell ---
The draft packaging guidelines says one CAN use lua(api)... to declare a
runtime dependency, but for my package, rpmbuild computes all runtime
dependencies. So the text suggests to me there is no need to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #65 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to comment #64)
> I removed the lua(api) requirement in the SPEC file because I received this
> message about el6:
>
per the draft Lua packaging guidelines, you're only supposed to use it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #64 from John D. Ramsdell ---
I removed the lua(api) requirement in the SPEC file because I received this
message about el6:
From:
Subject: Broken dependencies: datalog
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #63 from Fedora Update System ---
datalog-2.3-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/datalog-2.3-2.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #62 from John D. Ramsdell ---
I get it now. There is no need for me to edit the comps file as it's intended
to be only explicitly installed, not as part of a package group. And that
explains why I didn't need to do it for tpm-quote-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #61 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
(In reply to comment #59)
> Hmmm. I see I have to edit the comps.xml file when the package comes out of
> testing too. I don't remember having to do that with tpm-quote-tools. I've
> put in on m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System ---
datalog-2.3-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
pa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
John D. Ramsdell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #59 from John D.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #58 from Fedora Update System ---
datalog-2.3-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/datalog-2.3-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #57 from Fedora Update System ---
datalog-2.3-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/datalog-2.3-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #56 from Fedora Update System ---
datalog-2.3-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/datalog-2.3-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #55 from Kevin Fenzi ---
Did you submit an update?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Submit_Package_as_Update_in_Bodhi
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #54 from John D. Ramsdell ---
I did a "fedpkg build" for my f17 branch, but still have not been able to
perform a "sudo yum install datalog" on any of my Fedora 17 machines. Is there
something more I must do? I'm at a loss on how to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #53 from John D. Ramsdell ---
I found a laptop and did the fedpkg builds outside the firewall.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-revie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #52 from John D. Ramsdell ---
I still time out when the https_proxy var is set.
$ https_proxy=http://gatekeeper.mitre.org:80/ fedpkg -v build
Creating repo object from /home/ramsdell/fedora/datalog
Running: rpm -q --qf %{NAME} --spe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #51 from Kevin Fenzi ---
(In reply to comment #49)
> Please remove the initial CC as I will be the sole maintainer.
Yeah, removed.
(In reply to comment #50)
> Every time I try to build with
>
> $ fedpkg build
>
> I receive a time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #50 from John D. Ramsdell ---
Every time I try to build with
$ fedpkg build
I receive a time out. I am behind a firewall. Is it a proxy problem or does
it have something to do with putting FAS account 'tim' as an InitialCC?
--
Y
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #49 from John D. Ramsdell ---
Please remove the initial CC as I will be the sole maintainer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #48 from Tim Niemueller ---
My FAS Account is indeed timn, but please do not add me as InitialCC, I was
just the reviewer and will not maintain in any way.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ke...@scrye.com
--- Comment #47 from Kevin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #46 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
John D. Ramsdell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #45 from John D. Ramsdell ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: datalog
Short Description: A Lightweight Deductive Database using Datalog
Owners: ramsdell
Branches: f17 f18 el6
InitialCC: tim
--
You are r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
Tim Niemueller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #43 from John D. Ramsdell ---
What is blocking progress on the review of the Datalog package? Am I supposed
to be doing something? I thought I responded to all requests for changes.
John
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Yo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #42 from John D. Ramsdell ---
(In reply to comment #41)
Thank you Michel for your help.
I updated the spec as suggested except the make check target doesn't do real
test so I did not define the %check section.
Spec URL: http://www.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #41 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Hi John,
Some notes:
- BuildRoot definition is only required if you're targeting RHEL 5. If you do,
I'd suggest making it conditional:
%if 0%{?el5}
BuildRoot: ...
%endif
Likewise, unless you're o
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #40 from John D. Ramsdell ---
I updated the spec to replace occurences of %define by %global.
Spec URL: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/ramsdell/tools/datalog/datalog.spec
SRPM URL: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/datalog/datalog-2.2-2.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #39 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-04-26 08:24:10
EDT ---
Tim, do you need help with the 5.1 to 5.2 transition? After
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
John D. Ramsdell changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
Tim Niemueller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #36 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-04-08 17:34:56
EDT ---
There has been a major new release of datalog. The latest sp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #35 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-01-30 17:47:18
EST ---
The latest spec and SRPM are here:
Spec URL: http://www.ccs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #34 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-01-30 17:36:38
EST ---
Outside the firewall, I finally got a command-line version ko
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #33 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-01-30 08:51:04
EST ---
I still cannot get koji working. I reran fedora-packager-set
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #32 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-01-26 18:49:22
EST ---
Wait a minute. I was checking out python rpms and noticed a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #31 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-01-26 17:42:24
EST ---
When Lua 5.2 comes out, I suggest the following changes be ma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #30 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-01-19 22:36:24
EST ---
I created a new datalog release. The spec and SRPM is here:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #29 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-01-17 15:10:00
EST ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> (In reply to comment #27)
> > (In
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #28 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-01-17 15:04:35
EST ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #25)
Ah. A
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #27 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-01-17 14:52:46
EST ---
(In reply to comment #25)
I'm making progress addressing the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #26 from Tim Niemueller 2012-01-11 06:27:33
EST ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> + The package successfully compile
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #25 from Tim Niemueller 2012-01-10 20:02:14
EST ---
REVIEW:
Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #24 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-01-05 10:19:55
EST ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> This can only be done after appro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #23 from Tim Niemueller 2012-01-05 10:08:55
EST ---
This can only be done after approval. I'll look at it today. Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #22 from John D. Ramsdell 2012-01-05 09:29:54
EST ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #20 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-12-05 07:57:08
EST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Hi John.
>
> The spec file looks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #21 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-12-05 08:17:58
EST ---
I uploaded the new src.rpm file to
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/hom
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
Tim Niemueller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #18 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-10-12 09:10:57
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #15)
> I tri
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #17 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-10-12 08:57:41
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> - Can you relax the build requir
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #16 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-10-12 08:52:13
EDT ---
Created attachment 527693
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #15 from Tim Niemueller 2011-10-11 18:08:22
EDT ---
Hi John.
Nice work on the package, a few minor things and we'l
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
Tim Niemueller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #14 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-09-30 07:31:10
EDT ---
I resolved all the issues surrounding shared and static libra
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #12 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-09-27 09:27:30
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I'll take this review as I have s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
Tim Niemueller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
John D. Ramsdell changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #9 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-09-22 13:58:38
EDT ---
My sponsor is Tom "spot" Callaway.
--
Configure bugmail: htt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #8 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-09-20 11:35:31
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> When you've solved the bundled Lua
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #6 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-08-06 17:58:37
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> - Fedora usually avoids providing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #5 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-08-06 17:48:45
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> John, is this your first Fedora pac
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
Martin Gieseking changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #3 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-07-28 07:49:20
EDT ---
Everything is good to go.
Spec URL: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/ho
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #2 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-07-14 14:42:02
EDT ---
Hold it. There are more changes to the spec required. I'm wo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=720857
--- Comment #1 from John D. Ramsdell 2011-07-12 21:43:23
EDT ---
Datalog Manual: http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/ramsdell/tools/dat
72 matches
Mail list logo
