Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wxpdfdoc-0.9.2.1-4.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
WARNING: ulrich.te...@gmx.de is not a valid FAS account.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #15 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Git done (by process-git-requests).
Thank you.
WARNING: ulrich.te...@gmx.de is not a valid FAS account.
Oops, sorry.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #12 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Important: Please remove the obsolete stuff before you import your package
into non-el5 branches (if you ever want to have such a branch):
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #10 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #8)
A lot of issues which needs some explanation.
The macro-in-comment-warnings can be avoided by escaping the macro with a
second %.
Fixed.
Remove
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #9 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com ---
Thank you for your time, Mario!
All the URLs are actually working fine. The timeout would be an outage in
Fedora.
I will take a look at the other issues.
kind regards
Domingo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #7 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com 2012-05-16
18:08:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2012-05-04 18:58:10
EDT ---
I wonder, why in comment 1 rpmlint is
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
Guillermo Gómez guillermo.go...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #4 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com 2011-08-17
11:00:22 EDT ---
New spec with Dan's proposal for every
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #1 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com 2011-08-16
11:34:52 EDT ---
The x86_64 installation problem (lib for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730764
--- Comment #3 from Domingo Becker domingobec...@gmail.com 2011-08-16
12:32:00 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I think better
21 matches
Mail list logo
