Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-08 19:59:56 EDT ---
opendkim-2.4.2-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-08 19:56:44 EDT ---
opendkim-2.4.2-3.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-06 23:20:37 EDT ---
opendkim-2.4.2-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 st
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-06 20:25:55 EDT ---
opendkim-2.4.2-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 st
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System
2011-09-06 19:59:21 EDT ---
opendkim-2.4.2-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 st
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-24 15:10:27 EDT ---
opendkim-2.4.2-3.el6 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-24 15:10:19 EDT ---
opendkim-2.4.2-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-24 15:10:51 EDT ---
opendkim-2.4.2-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System
2011-08-24 15:10:35 EDT ---
opendkim-2.4.2-3.el5 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #32 from Jon Ciesla 2011-08-24 12:13:09 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https://
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #31 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-24 11:47:40
EDT ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: op
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Steve Jenkins changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #30 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-23 23:18:27
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> A quick review of the SHOULDs during
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Matt Domsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Matt Domsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #28 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-23 16:35:50
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> much improved. I see the current in
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #27 from Matt Domsch 2011-08-23 16:00:39 EDT
---
responding to above:
Packages can set themselves to automatically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Matt Domsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #25 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-23 14:36:06
EDT ---
Updated spec and SRPMs at:
http://packages.stevejenkins.com/ope
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #24 from Todd Lyons 2011-08-23 14:13:24 EDT ---
>(In reply to comment #21)
> * -devel requires fully versioned base
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #23 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-23 12:50:54
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> The above macro-in-comment bits can
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Todd Lyons changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #21 from Matt Domsch 2011-08-23 10:19:35 EDT
---
Review:
* rpmlint: see below
* name: OK
* spec file name matches:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #20 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-23 10:13:22
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> pkgconfig should be a BuildRequires,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Matt Domsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #18 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-23 01:28:04
EDT ---
Oh, also - I got rid of the additional external source and opted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #17 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-23 01:18:49
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Excellent. Much progress.
Thx - I'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #16 from Matt Domsch 2011-08-22 23:35:27 EDT
---
Excellent. Much progress.
You asked about the proper place for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #15 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 21:08:15
EDT ---
Most recent Koji results:
Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.or
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #14 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 20:46:46
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> c) explicitly patch the initfile fro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #13 from Matt Domsch 2011-08-22 15:35:32 EDT
---
c) explicitly patch the initfile from the upstream tarball using P
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #12 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 15:00:17
EDT ---
I've taken the key generation out of the spec file, what's the p
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #11 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 14:47:31
EDT ---
I guess not... the mkdir -p should be sufficient.
How's this lo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #10 from Matt Domsch 2011-08-22 14:40:56 EDT
---
Do you need all the test -d's ? mkdir -p will create (or not) if
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #9 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 14:32:33
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I'm doing this wrong, since I'm gettin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #8 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 12:24:23
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> * %post creates /var/run/opendkim and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #7 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 12:10:20
EDT ---
Found the cause of the rpmlint error - mentioning %install in the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #6 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 11:56:10
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > * libtool in the oldest distro noted
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #5 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-22 11:32:33
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> * Drop the "All rights reserved." text
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #4 from Matt Domsch 2011-08-21 23:58:37 EDT
---
This is not a thorough review, but some things that jumped out at m
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Matt Domsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #1 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-20 10:25:51
EDT ---
I've run the spec file and resulting RPMs through rpmlint, and su
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
--- Comment #2 from Steve Jenkins 2011-08-20 10:28:08
EDT ---
For anyone wanting to check Koji output, my FAS account name is s
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Steve Jenkins changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731898
Steve Jenkins changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
52 matches
Mail list logo
