Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System
2011-12-20 10:50:56 EST ---
snap-0.6-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System
2011-12-20 10:51:05 EST ---
snap-0.6-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System
2011-12-20 10:50:46 EST ---
snap-0.6-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System
2011-12-09 16:29:46 EST ---
snap-0.5-7.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System
2011-12-09 16:29:38 EST ---
snap-0.5-7.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System
2011-12-09 16:29:55 EST ---
snap-0.5-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-09 08:12:05 EST
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure bugmail: https:/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Mo Morsi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla 2011-12-08 18:49:18 EST
---
Summary name is Snap, SCM request name is snap, they should match.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Mo Morsi changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #21 from Richard Shaw 2011-12-08 15:20:19
EST ---
Yup, not a blocker, just needed to know what your plan was.
Full
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #20 from Mo Morsi 2011-12-08 15:09:56 EST ---
Agreed, will tag the release once all the changes to make the package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #18 from Mo Morsi 2011-12-08 11:34:49 EST ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> > > 2. Do we need python2 if we're buildin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #19 from Richard Shaw 2011-12-08 11:51:06
EST ---
Ok, last question I hope until I do the full guideline checks...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #17 from Richard Shaw 2011-12-08 09:28:50
EST ---
> > 2. Do we need python2 if we're building with python3?
> >
>
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #16 from Mo Morsi 2011-12-08 06:50:24 EST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Ack! Sorry I keep finding stuff :)
>
> 1.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #15 from Richard Shaw 2011-12-07 17:19:33
EST ---
Ack! Sorry I keep finding stuff :)
1. There's no documentation i
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #14 from Mo Morsi 2011-12-07 16:53:19 EST ---
Thanks for the review. Will try to take a look at your package in a bi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #12 from Richard Shaw 2011-12-07 09:43:04
EST ---
Ok, I took a look at the new spec ans srpm. I ran rpmlint on the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #13 from Richard Shaw 2011-12-07 10:35:30
EST ---
Ok, two more things:
1. If python 2.7 is going to be supported y
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #10 from Mo Morsi 2011-11-30 14:41:16 EST ---
ping? Do either of you guys happen to be a sponsored packager that can
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #9 from Richard Shaw 2011-11-23 09:23:50 EST
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> > I don't think I'd hold up a review fo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #8 from Mo Morsi 2011-11-23 08:32:56 EST ---
>
> > Ah hrm, which version of Fedora are you running against? It alwa
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #7 from Richard Shaw 2011-11-22 20:08:31 EST
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > I prefer to use /usr/share/icons/...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #6 from T.C. Hollingsworth 2011-11-22
19:08:44 EST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > Please keep lines under 40 char
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #5 from Mo Morsi 2011-11-22 18:35:59 EST ---
Again thank both of you so much for the very quick feedback. This is my
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #4 from T.C. Hollingsworth 2011-11-22
14:55:42 EST ---
RPMLint output is not clean:
> $ rpmlint ./snap-0.5-2.fc15.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #3 from Richard Shaw 2011-11-22 14:40:35 EST
---
I assume that the gsnap binary is a GUI[1]?
If so you should prob
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
--- Comment #2 from Mo Morsi 2011-11-22 12:52:53 EST ---
Hey thanks for the quick feedback. Updated the spec to remove the tabs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755890
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
39 matches
Mail list logo
