Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolutio
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #33 from Dan Horák ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> (In reply to comment #29)
> > - Provides: bundled(libtidy) needed for bundled stuff is missing
> >
> > APPROVED, please fix the missing Provides before import
>
> Wi
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #32 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
pack
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #30 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> - Provides: bundled(libtidy) needed for bundled stuff is missing
>
> APPROVED, please fix the missing Provides before import
Will do.
> And one more note - I wo
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #28 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> Great news!
>
> Ok, I can spot a small packaging issue - sigil has a .desktop file so this
> applies:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desk
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #27 from LightDot ---
Great news!
Ok, I can spot a small packaging issue - sigil has a .desktop file so this
applies:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files
Basically, there must be "BuildR
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #26 from Hans de Goede ---
Ok, good news, we've gotten an exception for tidy from the fpc, so here is a
new version:
Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/sigil.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.fedoraproje
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #25 from Dan Horák ---
re tidy - it has a new life at http://w3c.github.com/tidy-html5/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review maili
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #24 from Hans de Goede ---
Bundling exception request is here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/219
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
packa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #23 from Dan Horák ---
btw latest sigil is packaged at
http://fedora.danny.cz/danny/development/SRPMS/repoview/sigil.html
I've also tried to create a patch for usign system spelling dictionaries, but
the issue (http://code.google.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #22 from Hans de Goede ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Created attachment 576293 [details]
> diff between sigil and upstream libtidy
>
> Hans, I'm working on the review again, sorry for the delays.
>
> These are the changes between
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #21 from Dan Horák ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Hi,
>
> (In reply to comment #17)
> > With 0.5.3 sources, with dropped patches, rebuilt FlightCrew and ZipArchive,
> > rebuilt Sigil works just fine on Fedora 16 (local mock build).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #20 from Hans de Goede ---
Hi,
(In reply to comment #17)
> With 0.5.3 sources, with dropped patches, rebuilt FlightCrew and ZipArchive,
> rebuilt Sigil works just fine on Fedora 16 (local mock build).
>
> Has this review stopped due
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #19 from Mihai Limbășan ---
Additional maintainer notE: Upstream Sigil now bundles zlib 1.2.7 (
http://code.google.com/p/sigil/source/detail?r=89f6780e8e00b1ad6754c8780e2447069c3f638d
) and PCRE 8.31 (
http://code.google.com/p/sigil/s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #18 from Mihai Limbășan ---
Please note that, siarting with commit 0fdb1bcf3a6b7d74e7041c3f8336b80a58893c59
(details at
http://code.google.com/p/sigil/source/detail?r=0fdb1bcf3a6b7d74e7041c3f8336b80a58893c59
) , sigil has dropped ZipA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
LightDot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||light...@gmail.com
--- Comment #17 from Light
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
Mikko Tiihonen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikko.tiiho...@iki.fi
--- Comment #16 f
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #15 from Dan Horák 2012-04-09 15:47:51 EDT ---
Created attachment 576293
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachmen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #14 from Hans de Goede 2012-04-04 10:11:43
EDT ---
Dan,
I know you're probably busy with other stuff, still any ch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #13 from Hans de Goede 2012-02-01 03:06:34
EST ---
Note, during some tests I found out that my sigil packages would
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
Bug 772362 depends on bug 783151, which changed state.
Bug 783151 Summary: Review Request: FlightCrew - EPUB validation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede 2012-01-24 03:07:52
EST ---
I've all send all the patches for both Sigil and FlightCrew upst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede 2012-01-23 17:09:10
EST ---
Hi,
Here is an updated package using Sigil 0.5.0, patched to us
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
Bug 772362 depends on bug 773313, which changed state.
Bug 773313 Summary: Review Request: ZipArchive - The ZipArchive library
h
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #9 from Mihai Limbășan 2012-01-21 12:40:33 EST
---
Ping: Sigil 0.5.0 stable was just released.
--
Configure bugma
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede 2012-01-19 09:42:28 EST
---
Good news, I've got the entire sigil dep chain building, running
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede 2012-01-18 11:01:31 EST
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Hans, it's completely fine if you base
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák 2012-01-11 08:07:06 EST ---
Hans, it's completely fine if you base the packages on my work. But we
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
Hans de Goede changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
Brendan Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
--- Comment #3 from Dan Horák 2012-01-08 10:54:33 EST ---
ZipArchive needs unbundling, see URL above, bzip2 is not needed at all
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772362
Brendan Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
37 matches
Mail list logo
