[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2013-01-03 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2013-01-03 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 Julian C. Dunn jd...@aquezada.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-12-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 --- Comment #13 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- I pulled a request to change Moneta dependency and use Juno instead [1]. [1] https://github.com/opscode/chef/pull/552 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-12-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 --- Comment #14 from Julian C. Dunn jd...@aquezada.com --- (In reply to comment #13) I pulled a request to change Moneta dependency and use Juno instead [1]. [1] https://github.com/opscode/chef/pull/552 Awesome, thanks Josef!

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-12-17 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 --- Comment #12 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #10) I will push them. It looks like there is an open ticket about this upstream, http://tickets.opscode.com/browse/CHEF-2984 Yes, that is the link I

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 --- Comment #10 from Julian C. Dunn jd...@aquezada.com --- (In reply to comment #9) Actually, there is upstream ticket [1] to drop this dependency. Julian, could you please try to push Chef upstream a bit? Thank you. I will

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-12-16 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 --- Comment #11 from Julian C. Dunn jd...@aquezada.com --- (In reply to comment #6) Jonas, first of all, have you considered to replace moneta by juno [1] or something similar? I would say that this package is unmaintained by

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-12-14 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 --- Comment #6 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- Jonas, first of all, have you considered to replace moneta by juno [1] or something similar? I would say that this package is unmaintained by upstream and should not get into

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-12-14 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 --- Comment #7 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- Just a note regarding the test suite: It expects modules that have been added to the repository after the gem has been released (and the structure of the lib folder changed

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-12-14 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 --- Comment #8 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- (In reply to comment #6) Jonas, Ups, sorry s/Jonas/Julian/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-12-14 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 --- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- Actually, there is upstream ticket [1] to drop this dependency. Julian, could you please try to push Chef upstream a bit? Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-12-13 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-12-13 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 --- Comment #4 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- 1, Please move these files to -doc sub-package (they should not be part of the main package): %doc %{gem_instdir}/README %doc %{gem_instdir}/TODO 2, And exclude gem cache

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-12-13 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 --- Comment #5 from Julian C. Dunn jd...@aquezada.com --- Thanks Josef. I've updated the spec and SRPM for points 1 and 2. http://fedorapeople.org/~jdunn/rubygem-moneta/rubygem-moneta.spec

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-11-25 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 --- Comment #2 from Julian C. Dunn jd...@aquezada.com --- Since Jonas seems to no longer be working on these, I'm taking them over slowly. Here's my spec SRPM that I propose to use to undeprecate rubygem-moneta: can you please

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-06-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 Jonas Courteau r...@courteau.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | -- You are

[Bug 823338] Review Request: rubygem-moneta - unified interface for key/value stores

2012-05-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823338 Jonas Courteau r...@courteau.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: