https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System ---
egtk-3.1-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
packag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #16 from Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
egtk-3.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/egtk-3.1-1.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
egtk-3.1-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/egtk-3.1-1.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #12 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> And what about the error caused by the incorrect FSF address?
> Can you confirm there's no need to correct it and all I have to do is
> notifying upstream about?
https://bugz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
Mattia Meneguzzo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #11 from Matt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #10 from Mattia Meneguzzo ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> $ rpmlint -i -v *
> egtk-common.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/share/doc/egtk-common-3.1/COPYING
> The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdate
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from M
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #8 from Mattia Meneguzzo ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> No, it is usually not enough. In the current state, Yum could use any
> version of an egtk-common package as a dependency. The mentioned line was an
> example, directly taken fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> But then, when I try to install the packages built from the so-edited Spec
> file, Yum complains about them requiring "egtk = 3.1-3.fc17" and doesn't
> allow me to install.
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #6 from Mattia Meneguzzo ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Your packages have to depend on the base package:
>
> Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
>
> See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann ---
Your packages have to depend on the base package:
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
--
You are receiving thi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #4 from Mattia Meneguzzo ---
Spec URL: http://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/eGTK/2012.06.17/egtk.spec
SRPM URL:
http://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/eGTK/2012.06.17/egtk-3.1-2.fc17.src.rpm
RPM packages for Fedora 17:
http:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #3 from Mattia Meneguzzo ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> All the four subpackages own the folder %{_datadir}/themes/%{short_name}/
> and contain the same doc files. Currently, there's no base package named
> egtk. I recommend to add a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825517
--- Comment #1 from Mattia Meneguzzo ---
RPM packages for Fedora 17 (for those willing to try the theme):
GTK+2 theme:
http://odysseus.fedorapeople.org/packages/eGTK/2012.05.27/RPMs/egtk-gtk2-theme-3.1-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
GTK+3 theme:
http://odyss
19 matches
Mail list logo
