https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
--- Comment #10 from David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org ---
I don't think I'd get too worked up about package naming. When the library is
pulled in as a runtime dependency, it's referenced by the library name(s):
libhogweed.so.2()(64bit)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||432228
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com ---
Just a brief look:
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming
As a precedent, Debian and openSUSE called it libnettle.
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
--- Comment #7 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
Michael, thanks for the comments, but I have not posted a new spec yet due to
the indecision on the package name. Fedora previously had this library as
nettle:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hobbes1...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
--- Comment #3 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
2. I know hogweed is a library and on some other distros library packages
are always prefixed with lib, but as we don't have that convention in
Fedora, would
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
--- Comment #4 from Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
2. I know hogweed is a library and on some other distros library packages
are always prefixed with lib, but as we don't have that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
--- Comment #5 from Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com ---
(In reply to comment #4)
I like separating the devel packages so if you install one you don't
automatically pull in the other library.
The only problem with splitting -devel packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833573
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: libnettle - |Review Request:
10 matches
Mail list logo
