https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854256
Björn "besser82" Esser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://b
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854256
Erik Hugne changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|-
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854256
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||953379
--
You are re
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854256
--- Comment #5 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
macros to be used in %files:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25files_section
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsub
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854256
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@buffalo.edu
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854256
--- Comment #3 from Erik Hugne ---
The srpm/spec links still from the first request still apply:
Spec URL: http://marvin.hb0da.org/~dev/tipcutils.spec
SRPM URL: http://marvin.hb0da.org/~dev/tipcutils-2.0.3-0.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854256
--- Comment #2 from Erik Hugne ---
Thanks for the prompt feedback.
I have adressed your comments, and have one open question regarding the
license.
Is it required to have this as a separate file?
All files in tipcutils have the license prepended
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854256
Michael Scherer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@zarb.org
Blocks|
