https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|springframework-batch-2.1.9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
springframework-batch-2.1.9-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/springframework-batch-2.1.9-1.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
springframework-batch-2.1.9-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/springframework-batch-2.1.9-2.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #12 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Michal Srb from comment #10)
The package looks good, just one non-blocker:
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
Latest stable version is 2.2.2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
Bug 881753 depends on bug 877152, which changed state.
Bug 877152 Summary: Review Request: springframework-ws - Spring Web Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877152
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #7 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com ---
It seems like people prefer springframework-* naming [1], so let's keep the
name as it is.
[1]:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/java-devel/2013-October/004967.html
Looks like there
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
in my system (f19) is not available hsqldb 2.x, and i not sure if with the
changes that you ask of me, there are no problems of compatibility.
for now leave hsqldb 1.x
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
found a patch for hsqldb 2.x but is NOT applicable to this release
see https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-batch/pull/145
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #6 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #5)
for me it is not a problem, but the so called to make sure that users do not
confuse it with the packages related to spring(rts)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #4 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com ---
I have a suggestion here. I would rename the package to spring-batch.
springframework-batch is not wrong, but we already have packages like
spring-ldap, now spring-retry. These are standalone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
(In reply to Michal Srb from comment #4)
I have a suggestion here. I would rename the package to spring-batch.
springframework-batch is not wrong, but we already have packages like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/springframework-batch.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/springframework-batch-2.1.9-1.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||968136
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||652183
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/springframework-batch.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/springframework-batch-2.1.9-1.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
Bug 881753 depends on bug 866239, which changed state.
Bug 866239 Summary: Review Request: gemini-blueprint - Reference Implementation
of the OSGi Blueprint Service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866239
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881753
gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||877152,
26 matches
Mail list logo
