[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-01-20 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Gerard Ryan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-02-15 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED C

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-02-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #2 from Tomas Radej --- Hi, there are some licensing problems with this package - POM file declares the license to be ASL 2.0, but the ./license file and most of the files say EPL, Base64Coder is a class available in t

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-04 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||917656 -- You are receivi

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-17 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #3 from Gerard Ryan --- Hi, Tomas, any update on this? I was without a net connection for the past few weeks so I couldn't check up anything with it. For some reason I don't seem to be able to access bug #917656 that t

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #4 from Tomas Radej --- Hi, the blocking bug was private by mistake. It is viewable now. I am sorry for the inconvenience. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #5 from Gerard Ryan --- No problem, I figured it was accidental :) Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Bug 902017 depends on bug 917656, which changed state. Bug 917656 Summary: License field in openshift-java-client POM confusing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=917656 What|Removed |A

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-18 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #6 from Gerard Ryan --- Licensing problem fixed upstream. I've also just submitted a pull request to unbundle base64coder: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-java-client/pull/32 If/when that gets merged, I'll upda

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #7 from Andre Dietisheim --- Hi Gerard thanks for pointing this out and replacing the forked version by a proper maven dependency. Nevertheless one important goal in the openshift-java-client is to have as little 3rd

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #8 from Andre Dietisheim --- I filed this to our JIRA in https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-13812 so that we can easily keep track of it. Can you please add this reference to the jboss issue tracker (I cannot) so th

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Stanislav Ochotnicky changed: What|Removed |Added CC||socho...@redhat.co

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-19 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #9 from Andre Dietisheim --- I fixed the issue by using the JDK means to decode/encode base64 rather uisng the external class: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-java-client/pull/33 patch was pushed to master --

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-20 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #10 from Gerard Ryan --- Even better! :) Thanks for that André. I'll update this package proposal after work today then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from th

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-20 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #11 from Andre Dietisheim --- great, thanks :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=DqrdCH9KtX&a=cc_unsubscrib

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-20 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Gerard Ryan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(tra...@redhat.com

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-20 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #13 from Gerard Ryan --- I think it's ready now Tomas, please have a look when you get a chance, thanks! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-28 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(tra...@redhat.com | |)

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #15 from Gerard Ryan --- (In reply to comment #14) > Package Review > == > > Key: > [x] = Pass > [!] = Fail > [-] = Not applicable > [?] = Not evaluated > [ ] = Manual review needed > > > Issues: > =

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Tomas Radej changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | Flags|

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA -- You are

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- openshift-java-client-2.0.3-3.20130320git7073708.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #17 from Gerard Ryan --- (In reply to comment #16) > Sorry for the delay. The package is good to go. > > *** APPROVED *** Thanks a lot! :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Gerard Ryan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #1

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kRuzLYUXDu&a=

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | Flags|

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-04-22 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- openshift-java-client-2.0.3-3.20130320git7073708.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openshift-java-client-2.0.3-3.20130320git70

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Re

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-04-27 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- openshift-java-client-2.0.3-3.20130320git7073708.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 902017] Review Request: openshift-java-client - OpenShift Java Client

2013-05-02 Thread bugzilla
Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902017 Gerard Ryan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | -- You are receiving thi