https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226
David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226
David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226
--- Comment #5 from David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: http://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/libmwaw.spec
SRPM URL: http://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/libmwaw-0.1.7-1.fc18.src.rpm
(In reply to comment #3)
Full review
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226
David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226
Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226
--- Comment #4 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
(oh, I just saw your comment about pkgconfig in the gtkspellmm review request,
so ignore ;) )
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226
Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226
--- Comment #2 from David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I think the headers don't explicitly say GPLv2+ anywhere.
Anything LGPLv2+ is automatically GPLv2+, so I do not think this is a problem.
--
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928226
David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
12 matches
Mail list logo