https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
Peter Lemenkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #2 from Colin Walters ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> Does it really need ncurses/readline headers? I couldn't find any
> ncurses/readline includes in the js header files, at least.
Looks like it has an internal copy
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember ---
> > Does it really need ncurses/readline headers? I couldn't find any
> > ncurses/readline includes in the js header files, at least.
Just to clarify, I wasn't talking about BuildRequires. I w
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #4 from Colin Walters ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > > Does it really need ncurses/readline headers? I couldn't find any
> > > ncurses/readline includes in the js header files, at least.
>
> Just to clarify, I wasn'
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember ---
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5219049
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint mozjs17 \
mozjs17-devel \
mozjs17-debuginfo-17.0.0-1.x86_64.rpm \
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #6 from Kalev Lember ---
Rpmlint is pretty unhappy, but it's mostly warnings about wrongly set
executable bits, plus 2 other issues:
1) E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/js17-config
Probably worth fixing, although I
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #7 from Colin Walters ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Rpmlint is pretty unhappy, but it's mostly warnings about wrongly set
> executable bits, plus 2 other issues:
>
> 1) E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/js17-config
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #8 from Colin Walters ---
New versions uploaded (and thanks for the review!). I should have run rpmlint
myself, sorry for not doing so first.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #9 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) ---
Sorry for question but how it related to js package which we already have
version 1.8.5?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsu
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #10 from Colin Walters ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Sorry for question but how it related to js package which we already have
> version 1.8.5?
It's a new parallel-installable upstream stable standalone release.
--
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #11 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
---
I can't find info about inheritance. Is it different product and what
differences? Or one just may be then dropped? I'm js maintainer. May be it just
need to be updated
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #12 from Colin Walters ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Or one just may be then dropped?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-April/181131.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #13 from Kalev Lember ---
> It's a new parallel-installable upstream stable standalone release.
I agree, it makes a lot of sense to make it parallel installable. Whether it's
called mozjs17, or js17, or js and the old
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
Kalev Lember changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Commen
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #15 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)
---
Colin, thanks. I missed it.
Just naming small confusing me (initially I understand it as 1.7 just turned in
name).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #16 from Colin Walters ---
(In reply to comment #13)
>
> 1) I've just noticed that /usr/bin/js17 is still 3.9M, even after linking
> with external readline. Would it make sense to split it to another
> subpackage, or
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #17 from Colin Walters ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: mozjs17
Short Description: JavaScript interpreter and libraries
Owners: walters
Branches: f19
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
Colin Walters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |
Flags|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PsPU0sTpq3&a=
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
--- Comment #19 from Kalev Lember ---
Hey, did you forget to commit the two fixes from comment #16 to git?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.r
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=948345
Colin Walters changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #20
23 matches
Mail list logo
