https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|Elm |
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Jens Petersen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #11)
I wonder if it is better to use the tarball releases from github for now
which includes the standard library.
Seems this is not necessary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
--- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
I wonder if it is better to use the tarball releases from github for now
which includes the standard library.
Otherwise the following spec file seems to build okay
with fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Bug 982204 depends on bug 1058174, which changed state.
Bug 1058174 Summary: Review Request: ghc-aeson-pretty - JSON pretty-printing
library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058174
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Actually Elm 0.10.0.2 requires binary = 0.6.4.0, ie ghc-7.8!
So targeting 0.10.0.2 currently seems best
at least until ghc-7.8 is in rawhide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
--- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Latest now 0.12 - I /think/ still no more deps.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1058174
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Bug 982204 depends on bug 1023601, which changed state.
Bug 1023601 Summary: Review Request: ghc-aeson-pretty - JSON pretty-printing
library and command-line tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|1023601 |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
--- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Latest version is now 0.11 with some news features:
http://elm-lang.org/blog/announce/0.11.elm
Even better no additional deps afaics.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Bug 982204 depends on bug 1023605, which changed state.
Bug 1023605 Summary: Review Request: ghc-language-ecmascript - JavaScript
parser and pretty-printer library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023605
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
--- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Leon Neo from comment #6)
Actually, elm isnt as easy and isnt as good.
compared to what?
There is also helm, though I haven't tried it.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Leon Neo leonleon...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leonleon...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||NotReady
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Bug 982204 depends on bug 1023603, which changed state.
Bug 1023603 Summary: Review Request: ghc-data-default-class - A class for types
with a default value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023603
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Ralf Corsepius from comment #3)
Just a remark: I guess you are aware, there once was a then-very-popular
email client called elm [1]. Though I am not aware about any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Bug 982204 depends on bug 982189, which changed state.
Bug 982189 Summary: Review Request: ghc-hjsmin - Haskell implementation of a
javascript minifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982189
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||Elm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
I think it might be better to call the package Elm.
At least cabal-rpm currently assumes that name = pkg_name
for BinLib packages like this and it is also recommended
in the Haskell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982204
Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||982189, 982192
--
You
25 matches
Mail list logo