https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manisan...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #12 from František Dvořák ---
No, I just mean the new specfile/srpm, addressing the issues in comment #6.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from Chris
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|val...@civ.zcu.cz
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to František Dvořák from comment #8)
> Yes, I can review it. :-)
>
> Do you plan to push it to EPEL? I can imagine dput could be useful also
> there (RHEL or RHEL-based server working with Deb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #8 from František Dvořák ---
Yes, I can review it. :-)
Do you plan to push it to EPEL? I can imagine dput could be useful also there
(RHEL or RHEL-based server working with Debian packages...).
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to František Dvořák from comment #6)
> My observations:
>
> 1) description could be improved
>
> Inspiration can be found in upstream:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/dput.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
František Dvořák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz
--- Comment #6 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Ed Santiago from comment #4)
Oh I forgot to cleanup my brain ;)
Manpage should be installed to destdit mandir/man1 with install.
Then RPM will automatically gzip them.
Fixed.
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #4 from Ed Santiago ---
[ disclaimer#1: I'm not a packager yet; I'm just trying to learn the ropes ]
[ disclaimer#2: total n00b, so my interpretation of the guidelines may be off ]
That said...
1. Thanks for removing the %config.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
1. If I don't mark it as %config I'm afraid rpmlint will shout. But it's right
to not mark them as they are not conf files. I remember someone has marked it
as %config, or maybe I forget, whatever.
2. F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Meng ---
1. If I don't mark it as %config I'm afraid rpmlint will shout. But it's right
to not mark them as they are not conf files. I remember someone has marked it
as %config, or maybe I forget, whatever.
2. F
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987738
Ed Santiago changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||santi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Ed
16 matches
Mail list logo