Re: [PacketFence-users] OpenVAS integration

Hi Andrew, We have install packet fence on virtual box but we have some problem MAC authentication If anyone help me remotely for this problem. Regards Sachin Kumar India 8010457045 -Original Message- From: Torry, Andrew via PacketFence-users Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 10:0

[PacketFence-users] Problem with sponsor based registration after upgrade from 6.5 to 8.1

We were using sponsor based guest authorization with version 6.5, for some reason it’s broken on 8.1 When I receive the email to activate the user, I click on the link and it says that “No Active sponsor source for this connection Profile.” But I do have a sponsor defined. Here is what happens

Re: [PacketFence-users] Restrict access when using Google OAuth as source

Hello Murilo, it depends on how google do that and we are dependent on how they do it. Regards Fabrice Le 18-10-26 à 08 h 06, Murilo Calegari via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hi everyone, We noticed that in order to get Google OAuth source working, it was necessary to give free and unmonito

Re: [PacketFence-users] COA on CWP

Hello Wifi Guy, what sort of ap are you using ? Regards Fabrice Le 18-10-26 à 09 h 06, Wifi Guy via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hi All, I have a simple setup where I only have one interface selected (Management). Both deamons for Portal and RADIUS are loaded. I want to be able to authent

Re: [PacketFence-users] Cisco device - Some features not supported

Hello Cliff, if it's possible to do 802.1x and MAB then you are able to have a captive portal. The only thing that you can do is webauth (the switch redirection to the captive portal). Regards Fabrice Le 18-10-29 à 14 h 35, Cliff Campbell via PacketFence-users a écrit : I’m trying to c

Re: [PacketFence-users] getting started - interface questions

Hello Jessica, it depend how you configure the esx, do you have a interface with all the vlan tagged (only eth0 in the virtual machine) or a virtual interface for each vlan (it appear eth0, eth1, eth2, ethx... on the vm). Based on that, then you will need to create a vlan on the eth0 interfac

Re: [PacketFence-users] Problem with sponsor based registration after upgrade from 6.5 to 8.1

Hello Eric, does one of the source "local" contain an account how is sponsor ? Regards Fabrice Le 18-11-01 à 14 h 24, Eric Koons via PacketFence-users a écrit : We were using sponsor based guest authorization with version 6.5, for some reason it’s broken on 8.1 When I receive the email to ac

Re: [PacketFence-users] Problem with sponsor based registration after upgrade from 6.5 to 8.1

I’m not sure I understand your question. Eric Koons Sr. Network Engineer | CCNA Service Electric Cable TV and Communications | www.sectv.com eko...@sectv.com Office: 610-841-8355 Mobile: 610-533-6834 Fax: 610-797-2445 > On Nov 1, 2018, at 7:42 PM, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users > wr

Re: [PacketFence-users] getting started - interface questions

Hi Fabrice, It's a single ethernet interface with all vlans tagged except vlan 50 which is untagged. I'm a network engineer so server stuff, especially VMware is a bit new to me. I appreciate the assistance. Jessica From: Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018

Re: [PacketFence-users] getting started - interface questions

Ok so in this case if you lost the access then it mean that the default route is changed. check the default route before and after you play with the interfaces/vlan. Le 18-11-01 à 19 h 45, Jessica Cohen a écrit : Hi Fabrice, It’s a single ethernet interface with all vlans tagged except vlan

Re: [PacketFence-users] Problem with sponsor based registration after upgrade from 6.5 to 8.1

Is there any account in the local user database (tab users) where there is an action "mark as sponsor" ? Le 18-11-01 à 20 h 46, Eric Koons a écrit : I’m not sure I understand your question. Eric Koons Sr. Network Engineer | CCNA Service Electric Cable TV and Communications | www.sectv.com

Re: [PacketFence-users] Problem with sponsor based registration after upgrade from 6.5 to 8.1

Yes, there are 4 of them. Eric Koons Sr. Network Engineer | CCNA Service Electric Cable TV and Communications | www.sectv.com eko...@sectv.com Office: 610-841-8355 Mobile: 610-533-6834 Fax: 610-797-2445 > On Nov 1, 2018, at 9:51 PM, Durand fabrice wrote: > > Is there any account in the loc

Re: [PacketFence-users] Problem with sponsor based registration after upgrade from 6.5 to 8.1

Can you try that: diff --git a/html/captive-portal/lib/captiveportal/PacketFence/Controller/Activate/Email.pm b/html/captive-portal/lib/captiveportal/PacketFence/Controller/Activate/Email.pm index 3ac0e491af..55663361e5 100644 --- a/html/captive-portal/lib/captiveportal/PacketFence/Controller

Re: [PacketFence-users] Problem with sponsor based registration after upgrade from 6.5 to 8.1

Put that in a file (path.diff): diff --git a/html/captive-portal/lib/captiveportal/PacketFence/Controller/Activate/Email.pm b/html/captive-portal/lib/captiveportal/PacketFence/Controller/Activate/Email.pm index 3ac0e491af..55663361e5 100644 --- a/html/captive-portal/lib/captiveportal/PacketFe

Re: [PacketFence-users] Problem with sponsor based registration after upgrade from 6.5 to 8.1

I attempt to run this from the command line and I get git is an unrecognized option. Is there something I’m missing? This is CentOS. Eric Koons Sr. Network Engineer | CCNA Service Electric Cable TV and Communications | www.sectv.com eko...@sectv.com Office: 610-841-8355 Mobile: 610-533-6834 Fax

Re: [PacketFence-users] Problem with sponsor based registration after upgrade from 6.5 to 8.1

Got it and done. Below is from the packetfence.log file. This was attempting to authorize a user request from earlier today. Unfortunately I’m VPN’d in and only can access the admin gui and CLI, so if I need to generate a new guest request it will have to wait until tomorrow when I’m in the

Re: [PacketFence-users] Problem with sponsor based registration after upgrade from 6.5 to 8.1

The issue here is that the source_id is undef. It's suppose to be set when the activation code is generated. If you can check in the database with a request like: select * from activation where activation_code="9b777b6db43b9c2aeb4c484b0241f97b"; If the source_id is still undef then we will h

Re: [PacketFence-users] Problem with sponsor based registration after upgrade from 6.5 to 8.1

Database changed MariaDB [pf]> select * from activation where activation_code="9b777b6db43b9c2aeb4c484b0241f97b"; +-+---++---+---++--+-+---++-