[PacketFence-users] Clustering

Hi, getting this error: : Loaded virtual server pf.cluster Nov 8 18:03:52 pf01 load_balancer[9551]: Loaded virtual server pfcli.cluster Nov 8 18:03:52 pf01 load_balancer[9551]: Failed binding to auth address 10.252.2.143 port 1812 bound to server pf.cluster: Address already in use Nov 8 18:0

[PacketFence-users] Clustering

Hi mates, getting this error when I finish config the first node of the cluster with :" /usr/local/pf/bin/pfcmd service pf restart" packetfence.log: " packetfence: FATAL -e(3496): unable to connect to database: Host is not allowed to connect to this MariaDB server at -e line 1." regards

[PacketFence-users] Clustering Setup

Hi All, Hope you're all keeping well during the current pandemic? We have been users of Packetfence for several years now and with it performing a core business function there has been a considering amount of scrutiny over the reliability of having this service hosted on just a single server. I

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering

Hello Luís, if it's PacketFence 7.3 , try that: curl https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/fa866d14be0b16ef1af0ed849c85a481a4011048.diff | patch -p1 Regards Fabrice Le 2017-11-08 à 13:06, Luís Torres via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hi, getting this error: : Loaded virtual

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering

Thank you It worked. LT Em 2017-11-08 22:46, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users escreveu: > Hello Luís, > > if it's PacketFence 7.3 , try that: > > curl https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/fa866d14be0b16ef1af0ed849c85a481a4011048.diff [3] | patch -p1 > > Regards >

[PacketFence-users] Clustering - Active/Active?

Hi Clustering in PF 6.2.1 ZEN...  there is so much good stuff in the GUI for VIPs, Active/Active management address, VRRP ID and secret.  It's all so promising. And then I look at the Clustering Quick Installation Guide and it ignores it, recommends Active/Standby with database partition repli

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering Setup

Hello Talan, Le 20-06-12 à 03 h 51, Talan Westby via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hi All, Hope you’re all keeping well during the current pandemic? We have been users of Packetfence for several years now and with it performing a core business function there has been a considering amount of s

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering Setup

Hello Talan, If you are unsure of the process, you can still purchase a small time bank from Inverse and we will guide you and assit you in that cluster setup. https://inverse.ca/#help Thanks, Ludovic Zammit lzam...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.4

[PacketFence-users] Clustering and interfaces.

I am attempting to setup pf in vlan enforcement mode. I setup eth0 as management, and I added a few non-routed 192.168 interfaces to meet the isolation and registration vlan requirements for the config wizard. Do I need to add those other interfaces to cluster.conf even though I am not going to u

[PacketFence-users] Clustering Inline Boxes

I am setting up clustering but I cannot find decent documentation on cluster.conf. I need to know what the valid options are, specifically for "type=". I tried to set "inline" and “inlinel2”, but those keywords aren’t recognized. Does anyone have documentation or experience with clustering inlin

[PacketFence-users] Clustering-nodes rebooted

Hello mates, I rebooted all 3 nodes at same time and now it keeps me sending me this error: pf::db::db_connect) Dec 11 21:33:02 pf01 packetfence: FATAL -e(626): unable to connect to database: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (111 "Connection refu

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering - Active/Active?

Okay replying to my own here... Having now done the CentOS 6 installation, some stuff is becoming a little clearer.    WHY DOES THE pf.conf file have local node information in it, but is synced as a shared file? I'm thinking of the interface information primarily in mine, [interfac

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering - Active/Active?

Greg, Am 29.09.2016 17:35, schrieb Greg Harewood: >    WHY DOES THE pf.conf file have local node information in it, but is > synced as a shared file? > > I'm thinking of the interface information primarily in mine, This is overridden in cluster.conf, see https://packetfence.org/doc/Pac

[PacketFence-users] Clustering Guide Sanity Check

Greetings, I've been pulling my hair out trying to get a 3-node PF Cluster running. Has anyone recently followed the clustering guide running the latest PF version? I'm usually pretty good at following instructions, but there is something very broken about the clustering guide. Anybody have any

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering and interfaces.

Hello Michael, cluster.conf need to know each interfaces of each servers managed by packetfence. Regards Fabrice Le 2017-07-21 à 16:01, Michael via PacketFence-users a écrit : I am attempting to setup pf in vlan enforcement mode. I setup eth0 as management, and I added a few non-routed 19

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering Inline Boxes

uot;packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net" Date: Friday, September 15, 2017 at 11:59 AM To: "packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net" Cc: "Trinklein, Jason R" Subject: [PacketFence-users] Clustering Inline Boxes I am setting up clustering but I cannot find decent documenta

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering-nodes rebooted

017 3:34 PM To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net Cc: Luís Torres Subject: [PacketFence-users] Clustering-nodes rebooted Hello mates, I rebooted all 3 nodes at same time and now it keeps me sending me this error: pf::db::db_connect) Dec 11 21:33:02 pf01 packetfence: FATAL -e(626): unab

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering-nodes rebooted

; > Fone: 254-295-4658 > Phax: 254-295-4221 > ____ > From: Luís Torres via PacketFence-users > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 3:34 PM > To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Cc: Luís Torres > Subject: [PacketFence-users] Clustering-nodes reb

[PacketFence-users] Clustering over different subnets

Hello everyone, I'm trying to figure out how to set up a cluster over two different subnets. I just need a DB replication for my two servers. So I read through the clustering guide. But I'm a bit lost. There are several sections where it's mentioned you need at least 3 servers. But there is no

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering Guide Sanity Check

Hello Christian, in which step do you have an issue ? Regards Fabrice Le 20-07-06 à 18 h 49, Christian McDonald via PacketFence-users a écrit : Greetings, I've been pulling my hair out trying to get a 3-node PF Cluster running. Has anyone recently followed the clustering guide running the

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering Guide Sanity Check

Here is my setup: 1. 3 x CentOS 7 (fully up-to-date) w/ SELinux *disabled *+ firewalld *disabled *and *masked *+ IPv6 *disabled *(via sysctl.conf and /etc/defaults/grub ipv6.disable=1). I also have net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind = 1 in sysctl.conf. Xtrabackup is also installed. Each box is

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering Guide Sanity Check

If I was you, I will: - break the `--force-new-cluster` command - completely stop any MariaDB service - restart at this step: #v+ systemctl stop packetfence-mariadb /usr/local/pf/bin/pfcmd generatemariadbconfig /usr/local/pf/sbin/pf-mariadb --force-new-cluster #v- -- Nicolas Quiniou-Briand n...@i

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering Guide Sanity Check

I've also discovered what appears to be an issue in haproxy-admin.conf https://pastebin.com/GpFQCtJD This line is missing an argument, which is preventing haproxy-admin from starting. http-request set-header Host On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 11:50 AM Christian McDonald wrote: > The only obvious iss

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering Guide Sanity Check

Seems that the galera side is operational and replicating...I see all three nodes in incoming_addresses and operational status is 'synced' on all three nodes too. keepalive seems to be working fine too. Only problem is that haproxy-admin isn't starting on the primary node. https://pastebin.com/Vs

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering Guide Sanity Check

Still getting the 'could not write namespace ... L2 cache' errors. On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 7:49 AM Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users wrote: > If I was you, I will: > - break the `--force-new-cluster` command > - completely stop any MariaDB service > - restart at this step: > > #v+ > sy

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering Guide Sanity Check

The only obvious issue I see in packetfence.log related to haproxy-admin is: Jul 7 11:47:08 pf1 packetfence: -e(6841) WARN: Use of uninitialized value $portal_preview_ip in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/services/manager/haproxy_admin.pm line 219. (pf::services::manager::hap

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering Guide Sanity Check

Seems that I had my nose on a bug. https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/5667 /closing Thanks all! On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 12:16 PM Christian McDonald wrote: > I've also discovered what appears to be an issue in haproxy-admin.conf > > https://pastebin.com/GpFQCtJD > > This line is

Re: [PacketFence-users] Clustering over different subnets

Hello Johannes, You need 3 nodes because the database quorum. Thanks, Ludovic Zammit Product Support Engineer Principal Lead Cell: +1.613.670.8432 Akamai Technologies - Inverse 145 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142 Connect with Us:

[PacketFence-users] clustering: minimum number of nodes

Hi everybody, I need to start learning about clustering and I have a general question: The documentation and Daniel mention that a cluster consists of three nodes. What is the reason for the number **three**? Wouldn't a cluster be possible with two nodes, also? Thanks, Chris -- Packetfen