Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread oldcpu
This is a subject a bit 'dear' to my openSUSE use, as I've always held the view that the packages packaged by the Packman packagers was possibly the main reason why I have remained with openSUSE all these years. I am VERY grateful to the efforts of the 3rd party packagers who package for openSUSE,

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Pascal Bleser
On 2010-12-31 02:49:06 (+), Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Pascal Bleser writes: > > Option 3: debianista > > > > Another approach to "several projects/repos" could also be to split into > > stable and unstable or, rather, to freeze the versions of codecs and > > multimedia pa

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Pascal Bleser
On 2010-12-30 22:39:07 (-0500), todd rme wrote: > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Pascal Bleser > wrote: > > On 2010-12-31 01:43:22 (+0100), Marcel Gmür wrote: > >> You could also "safe" some build power by simply not building > >> packages, which are already built and maintained at obs, e.g. I

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Herbert Graeber
Am Freitag, 31. Dezember 2010, 00:27:12 schrieb Pascal Bleser: > Dear Packmans :) > (I'm putting the discussion on the public list to give our users a > chance to give their input/preferences as well) > > Detlef was so kind to set up a new (and fresh) OBS 2.1 instance (it's on > another server, th

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Detlef Reichelt
Moin, Am Fri, 31 Dec 2010 13:16:18 +0100 schrieb Herbert Graeber : > I would like to have a variant of option 3 on top of option 2: > > codecs:11.2 > multimedia:11.2 > games:11.2 > stuff:11.2 hm, why codecs and multimedia? multimedia (1) contrib (all other stuff) games In (1) we should provid

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Marcel Gmür
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Pascal Bleser wrote: > On 2010-12-31 01:43:22 (+0100), Marcel Gmür wrote: >> You could also "safe" some build power by simply not building >> packages, which are already built and maintained at obs, e.g. I had >> some zypper dup issues with p7zip or some games lik

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Pascal Bleser
On 2010-12-31 13:46:43 (+0100), Detlef Reichelt wrote: > Moin, > > Am Fri, 31 Dec 2010 13:16:18 +0100 > schrieb Herbert Graeber : > > > I would like to have a variant of option 3 on top of option 2: > > > > codecs:11.2 > > multimedia:11.2 > > games:11.2 > > stuff:11.2 > > hm, why codecs and mu

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Herbert Graeber
Moin Detlef First, you missed the important part of my mail, that is the handling similar to openSUSE:Contrib, that means having frozen repos for each openSUSE distribution that can be used without big hassle and unimportant updates by the average user. Am Freitag, 31. Dezember 2010, 13:46:43

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Carl Eugen Hoyos
Pascal Bleser writes: > So the idea with "option 3" would be to provide both: > - we would keep the current approach in the "regular" repository (or > repositories) > - we would also *additionally* provide a frozen repository with the > "essential" packages (as said, ffmpeg, mplayer, mad, gst

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Pascal Bleser
On 2010-12-31 14:36:57 (+), Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > Pascal Bleser writes: > > > So the idea with "option 3" would be to provide both: > > - we would keep the current approach in the "regular" repository (or > > repositories) > > - we would also *additionally* provide a frozen repository

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Pascal Bleser
On 2010-12-31 15:32:19 (+0100), Herbert Graeber wrote: > First, you missed the important part of my mail, that is the handling similar > to openSUSE:Contrib, that means having frozen repos for each openSUSE > distribution that can be used without big hassle and unimportant updates by > the aver

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Pascal Bleser
On 2010-12-31 13:48:49 (+0100), Marcel Gmür wrote: > On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Pascal Bleser > wrote: > > On 2010-12-31 01:43:22 (+0100), Marcel Gmür wrote: > >> You could also "safe" some build power by simply not building > >> packages, which are already built and maintained at obs, e.g

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Mariusz Fik
Dnia piątek, 31 grudnia 2010 o 13:46:43 Detlef Reichelt napisał(a): > Moin, > > Am Fri, 31 Dec 2010 13:16:18 +0100 > > schrieb Herbert Graeber : > > I would like to have a variant of option 3 on top of option 2: > > > > codecs:11.2 > > multimedia:11.2 > > games:11.2 > > stuff:11.2 > > hm, why c

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Detlef Reichelt
Am Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:48:39 +0100 schrieb Pascal Bleser : > we can also make an "essentials" thats the name! > repository with just a subset of what we believe most people need or > would like to install (mplayer, ffmpeg, k3b-codecs, xine-codecs, vlc, > gstreamer-bad, gstreamer-ugly, audacity,

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Manfred Tremmel
Am Freitag, 31. Dezember 2010 schrieb Pascal Bleser: > On 2010-12-31 14:36:57 (+), Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Pascal Bleser writes: > > > So the idea with "option 3" would be to provide both: > > > - we would keep the current approach in the "regular" repository > > > (or repositories) > >

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread İsmail Dönmez
Hi; On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Manfred Tremmel wrote: > ffmpeg makes releases 0.6.1 is released in october. But between 0.5 and > 0.5.1 they found security holes which where fixed fast in svn bot it's > taken two month until 0.5.1 was released so I've desided to build svn > snapshots and no

Re: [packman] OBS 2.x and new repository layout

2010-12-31 Thread Cristian Morales Vega
2010/12/31 Pascal Bleser : > Dear Packmans :) > (I'm putting the discussion on the public list to give our users a > chance to give their input/preferences as well) > > Detlef was so kind to set up a new (and fresh) OBS 2.1 instance (it's on > another server, the currently running OBS 1.7 instance