Am Freitag, 6. April 2012, 01:01:04 schrieben Sie:
> 1.1.20.1-60.2 from Packman
I can't belive, our current version for openSUSE 11.4 is 1.1.20.1-58.12
> > What way do you use to update the package?
>
> Yast2 from KDE
>
> > Do you have Packman Repository as Install-Source?
>
> Yes
>
> > Whic
Am 06.04.2012 00:29, schrieb Manfred Tremmel:
> Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2012, 22:24:25 schrieb Smartysmart34:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just tried to upgrade to VLC 2.0.
>> I encountered a whole bunch of cross dependencies from libpostproc52,
>> libavutil51, libxine1-codecs...
>>
>> So if I want to upgrade
Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2012, 22:24:25 schrieb Smartysmart34:
> Hi all,
>
> Just tried to upgrade to VLC 2.0.
> I encountered a whole bunch of cross dependencies from libpostproc52,
> libavutil51, libxine1-codecs...
>
> So if I want to upgrade libavutil51 to the new version I will have to
> unins
Hi all,
Just tried to upgrade to VLC 2.0.
I encountered a whole bunch of cross dependencies from libpostproc52,
libavutil51, libxine1-codecs...
So if I want to upgrade libavutil51 to the new version I will have to
uninstall libpostproc51 and if I do so libxine1-codecs is broken.
This is too much
Dear Packman Team,
Thanks VLC 2x is available at last. But your VLC packages version
2.0.1-2.2. don't provide the VLC Mozilla plugin. Besides that I have to
downgrade some libvlccore packages. I don't understand that.
So it's not usefull for me and for the time being I've to stick with VLC
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:09:29 +0200
Pascal Bleser
wrote:
> On 2012-04-05 16:02:30 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega
> wrote:
> > On 5 April 2012 15:45, Pascal Bleser
> > wrote:
> > > Henne added SLE-11-SP2. And why go with SP1 if we can go with
> > > SP2 ?
>
> > SP1 seems to be the oldest supported
On 2012-04-05 16:02:30 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega
wrote:
> On 5 April 2012 15:45, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> > Henne added SLE-11-SP2. And why go with SP1 if we can go with SP2 ?
> SP1 seems to be the oldest supported version. Building against it
> warranties it will work with all the supported
On 5 April 2012 15:45, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Henne added SLE-11-SP2. And why go with SP1 if we can go with SP2 ?
SP1 seems to be the oldest supported version. Building against it
warranties it will work with all the supported versions of SLE-11
(those being SP1 and SP2, but no GA).
> I mean, th
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:43:58 +0200
Pascal Bleser
wrote:
> On 2012-04-05 14:06:12 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega
> wrote:
> > On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser
> > wrote:
> > > Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
> > > and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in or
Hi
Unrelated... why are we building against both SLE_11 and SLE-11-SP2?
Every binary compiled against SLE_11 should work with SLE-11-SP2.
Does it? I mean, really? SLE-11-SP2 ships different libs and
different versions of libs so ...
If you have a package build against SLE_11 SP1 that does not wo
On 5 April 2012 15:43, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> On 2012-04-05 14:06:12 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega
> wrote:
>> Unrelated... why are we building against both SLE_11 and SLE-11-SP2?
>> Every binary compiled against SLE_11 should work with SLE-11-SP2.
>
> Does it? I mean, really? SLE-11-SP2 ships
On 2012-04-05 15:54:17 (+0200), Christian wrote:
> Am 05.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
> >On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> >>Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
> >>and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all
> >>the depe
On 5 April 2012 14:27, todd rme wrote:
> There were some build errors for openSUSE 12.1. I think I fixed them,
> but with vlc no longer working I cannot test the build, so there may
> still be build errors. If the new version of the backend is not in
> the repo by tuesday when I get back I will
On 2012-04-05 14:06:12 (+0100), Cristian Morales Vega
wrote:
> On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> > Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
> > and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all
> > the dependencies (those packages are named libxxx-
Am 05.04.2012 15:06, schrieb Cristian Morales Vega:
On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser wrote:
Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all
the dependencies (those packages are named libxxx-for-sle or
libxxx-for-
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Cristian Morales Vega
wrote:
> On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser wrote:
>> Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
>> and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all
>> the dependencies (those packages are named libxxx-for-
On 5 April 2012 08:16, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
> and sometimes for Evergreen_11.1 or 11.2 in order to have all
> the dependencies (those packages are named libxxx-for-sle or
> libxxx-for-older-than-11.4, etc... in Essentials).
libmat
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Pascal Bleser
wrote:
> phonon-backend-vlc builds just fine with vlc-2.0.1 (just needs a
> few changes to the spec file as it currently requires vlc <
> 1.2). I can't test it myself, but I'll submit the changes and if
> people notice that phonon-backend-vlc is broken
JFYI, been working on vlc 2.0 the past few days.
I obviously started from dimstar's spec file but made a few
adjustments to build properly on all our distros in Essential,
and also enabled libtar support.
Hence I had to package a few things only for SLE_11, SLE-11-SP2,
and sometimes for Evergreen_
19 matches
Mail list logo
