On 01/22/2010 09:19 PM, Florian Pritz wrote:
Hi,
Regarding the current mass rebuilds because of libpng I'd like to
suggest implementing so dependencies again.
Bump.
I'd really like to get some comments regarding this patch.
--
Florian Pritz -- {flo,bluewi...@server-speed.net
On 02/02/2010 09:13 PM, Nagy Gabor wrote:
This is not the competent ML to decide if ArchLinux's repos should use
these flags, personally I have some concerns about db.tar.gz size. (That
needs testing, which requires patched makepkg, too.)
I've repacked core and the results are quite good:
On 02/02/2010 09:13 PM, Nagy Gabor wrote:
This is not the competent ML to decide if ArchLinux's repos should use
these flags, personally I have some concerns about db.tar.gz size. (That
needs testing, which requires patched makepkg, too.)
I've repacked core and the results are quite
On 02/02/2010 09:13 PM, Nagy Gabor wrote:
This is not the competent ML to decide if ArchLinux's repos should use
these flags, personally I have some concerns about db.tar.gz size. (That
needs testing, which requires patched makepkg, too.)
I've repacked core and the results are
On 03/02/10 03:02, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 27.01.2010 00:24, schrieb Allan McRae:
- would anyone want to strip everything regardless of their
permissions (and running strip as root for that reason) ?
I have no idea why libraries/binaries are installed without 644/755
permissions anyway.