Re: [pacman-dev] implement .so dependencies?

2010-02-02 Thread Florian Pritz
On 01/22/2010 09:19 PM, Florian Pritz wrote: Hi, Regarding the current mass rebuilds because of libpng I'd like to suggest implementing so dependencies again. Bump. I'd really like to get some comments regarding this patch. -- Florian Pritz -- {flo,bluewi...@server-speed.net

Re: [pacman-dev] implement .so dependencies?

2010-02-02 Thread Florian Pritz
On 02/02/2010 09:13 PM, Nagy Gabor wrote: This is not the competent ML to decide if ArchLinux's repos should use these flags, personally I have some concerns about db.tar.gz size. (That needs testing, which requires patched makepkg, too.) I've repacked core and the results are quite good:

Re: [pacman-dev] implement .so dependencies?

2010-02-02 Thread Nagy Gabor
On 02/02/2010 09:13 PM, Nagy Gabor wrote: This is not the competent ML to decide if ArchLinux's repos should use these flags, personally I have some concerns about db.tar.gz size. (That needs testing, which requires patched makepkg, too.) I've repacked core and the results are quite

Re: [pacman-dev] implement .so dependencies?

2010-02-02 Thread Nagy Gabor
On 02/02/2010 09:13 PM, Nagy Gabor wrote: This is not the competent ML to decide if ArchLinux's repos should use these flags, personally I have some concerns about db.tar.gz size. (That needs testing, which requires patched makepkg, too.) I've repacked core and the results are

Re: [pacman-dev] [PATCH] makepkg: only strip files that are writable

2010-02-02 Thread Allan McRae
On 03/02/10 03:02, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 27.01.2010 00:24, schrieb Allan McRae: - would anyone want to strip everything regardless of their permissions (and running strip as root for that reason) ? I have no idea why libraries/binaries are installed without 644/755 permissions anyway.