On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
Xavier wrote:
I submitted a similar patch 1 year and a half ago, but it was never
accepted :
http://www.mail-archive.com/pacman-dev@archlinux.org/msg00109.html
So I am afraid you are stuck with yaourt / pacsearch / any
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Nagy Gaborng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
What is wrong with printf(_( [installed]));?
For my taste, printing [installed] when I have _older version_
installed, a bit strange. In this case [installed: 2.0-1] would be
better (but harder to parser).
Afaik, it is
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Nagy Gaborng...@bibl.u-szeged.hu wrote:
What is wrong with printf(_( [installed]));?
For my taste, printing [installed] when I have _older version_
installed, a bit strange. In this case [installed: 2.0-1] would be
better (but harder to parser).
Xavier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:18 PM, djsza...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Laszlo Papp djsza...@gmail.com
To get feedback while searching instead of using another utility for
this purpose, whether the desired packages are installed. You can see
example for it in case of yaourt.
