Regarding the latest pilrc 2.9p5...
Been going through the paces with high-density bitmaps, but after
exchanging emails with some folks at Palm I don't understand some
limitations regarding double-density bitmaps created with the latest pilrc2.9.
Why must the "DENSITY 2" flag only apply to membe
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, r. zane rutledge wrote:
> Why must the "DENSITY 2" flag only apply to members of a "family"? Why
> not just add a density flag to any BITMAP or BITMAPCOLOR or anything
> else? Why can you "not have only bmp with DENSITY 2 in BitmapFamilyEx."?
> (As far as I can tell, this isn't
Computing Europe, a PalmSource, Inc. subsidiary
When the finger points to the sky, the idiot looks at the finger.
-Original Message-
From: r. zane rutledge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:51 AM
To: Palm Developer Forum
Subject: PILRC 2.9 BitmapFamilyEx Density 2
Aaron Ardiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you know what a pain in the a** it was to get hi-density into pilrc? ;P
Hey, I didn't mean to be ungrateful! I mean, I love the fact that PILRC
got updated at all! Don't get me wrong. I was just giving some feedback
as I knew it wasn't "final" Afte
Europe, a PalmSource, Inc. subsidiary
When the finger points to the sky, the idiot looks at the finger.
-Original Message-
From: r. zane rutledge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:31 PM
To: Palm Developer Forum
Subject: Re: PILRC 2.9 BitmapFamilyEx Density 2
Aa
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, r. zane rutledge wrote:
> BITMAPFAMILYEX ID 1000
> BEGIN
>BITMAP "bitmap_doubledensity.bmp" BPP 8 DENSITY 2
> END
>
> I get an error: "BitmapFamilyEx must have at least one bitmap
> with density 1."
put a dummy bitmap there? :P
> BITMAPFAMILYEX ID 1000
> BEGIN
>BITM
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Regis Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zane,
>
> I am almost sure that there is something is the OS which forces the
> need for a d1 bitmap but I can't remember. I guess I should check.
> That's the reason why I put this warning in PilRC (because _I_ (and
> Renaud) k
Aaron Ardiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BITMAPFAMILYEX ID 1000
> > BEGIN
> >BITMAP "dummy.bmp" BPP 1 DENSITY 1
> >BITMAP "bitmap_doubledensity.bmp" BPP 8 DENSITY 2
> > END
>
> ^^ does that work?
Yes. (And that is what I have been doing.)
> if we dont need a DENSITY 1 bitmap - ma
.
-Original Message-
From: r. zane rutledge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:26 PM
To: Palm Developer Forum
Subject: Re: PILRC 2.9 BitmapFamilyEx Density 2
Aaron Ardiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BITMAPFAMILYEX ID 1000
> > BEGIN
> >
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, r. zane rutledge wrote:
> Aaron Ardiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > BITMAPFAMILYEX ID 1000
> > > BEGIN
> > >BITMAP "dummy.bmp" BPP 1 DENSITY 1
> > >BITMAP "bitmap_doubledensity.bmp" BPP 8 DENSITY 2
> > > END
> >
> > ^^ does that work?
>
> Yes. (And that is what I
.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Ardiri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 12:04 AM
To: Palm Developer Forum
Subject: Re: PILRC 2.9 BitmapFamilyEx Density 2
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, r. zane rutledge wrote:
> Aaron Ardiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Regis Nicolas wrote:
> I can confirm that using bitmap families with only density 2 bitmaps
> produces weird behavior on PalmOS 5 Simulator (easy to verify). When the BF
> contains at least 1 density 1 bitmap it works fine.
did you figure out why it is like this in the os so
12 matches
Mail list logo
