RE: webOS SDK

2009-07-03 Thread luis maldonado
you can always be bored somewhere else. I'm grateful to be able to get things of my chest so I can move on!!!... Subject: RE: webOS SDK Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 10:18:05 +0100 From: john.sut...@xtaq.com To: palm-dev-forum@news.palmos.com Bored! Doesn't seem to be helping me wi

RE: webOS SDK

2009-07-03 Thread luis maldonado
their ridiculous pricing structure and I'll be whinning and bitching for as long as it hurts > Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:12:37 -0700 > From: phrkonale...@gmail.com > To: palm-dev-forum@news.palmos.com > Subject: Re: webOS SDK > > luis maldonado wrote: > >

Re: webOS SDK

2009-07-03 Thread codemaker
Hi Roger > WinMo, in its current form, is a dead OS. Why do you think Windows Mobile is dead. If you sum up all the devices on a worldwide smart phone sales it comes second. I'm not in any way favorite of winMobile but I must say that I'm planning to switch to this platform since I'm not familia

Re: webOS SDK

2009-07-02 Thread Don Albertson
John V Sutton said (on or about) 07/02/2009 05:18: > Bored! > Doesn't seem to be helping me with my Palm Development! > Can we end this conversation please! I've got a spare Delete key if yours is broken. -- For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http

Re: webOS SDK

2009-07-02 Thread Christopher Stamper
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Regis St-Gelais < regis.st-gel...@laubrass.com> wrote: > And you will have to sign the I love apple agreemen t and they will have the > power to accept or deny you application based on there own rules and you > have nothing to say about it. > They decide what is pu

RE: webOS SDK

2009-07-02 Thread Philip Sheard
- From: Regis St-Gelais [mailto:regis.st-gel...@laubrass.com] Sent: 02 July 2009 14:11 To: Palm Developer Forum Subject: Re: webOS SDK And you will have to sign the I love apple agreement and they will have the power to accept or deny you application based on there own rules and you have nothing to

Re: webOS SDK

2009-07-02 Thread Regis St-Gelais
And you will have to sign the I love apple agreement and they will have the power to accept or deny you application based on there own rules and you have nothing to say about it. They decide what is published and what is not on there store. Its written black and white on the aggreement. StyleTa

RE: webOS SDK

2009-07-02 Thread Philip Sheard
V old chap, it may not be going anywhere, but this is the only thread we have. From: John V Sutton [mailto:john.sut...@xtaq.com] Sent: 02 July 2009 10:18 To: Palm Developer Forum Subject: RE: webOS SDK Bored! Doesn't seem to be helping me with my Palm Development! Can we end

RE: webOS SDK

2009-07-02 Thread John V Sutton
Bored! Doesn't seem to be helping me with my Palm Development! Can we end this conversation please! __ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.

Re: webOS SDK

2009-07-01 Thread Eric Bresie
s deal with the > changes, not by wasting energy on something that cannot be controlled, but > by defining and showing the new opportunities. > > > > > Lee Church > www.mobitechsystems.com > > *From:* luis maldonado [mailto:luis.maldon...@hotmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, Ju

RE: webOS SDK

2009-07-01 Thread Lee Church
that cannot be controlled, but by defining and showing the new opportunities. Lee Church www.mobitechsystems.com From: luis maldonado [mailto:luis.maldon...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 5:06 PM To: Palm Developer Forum Subject: RE: we

Re: webOS SDK

2009-07-01 Thread Ryan Rix
luis maldonado wrote: I have a product which was doing well with the TX in the restaurant business and was hoping there would an extension or hand of in their >handeld devices to some other company willing to create the NON-PHONE >devices as there is a business in that area. At least Apple in T

RE: webOS SDK

2009-07-01 Thread luis maldonado
tems.com > To: palm-dev-forum@news.palmos.com > Subject: RE: webOS SDK > Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 11:22:53 -0500 > > I was around when the original Palm Pilot was introduced, and my memory > (fallible, I'll admit) is that the development kit was not distributed until > about 3

RE: webOS SDK

2009-07-01 Thread luis maldonado
Amen, Luis. > From: shea...@tiscali.co.uk > To: palm-dev-forum@news.palmos.com > Subject: RE: webOS SDK > Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:01:34 +0100 > > Yes, that pisses me off too. > > -Original Message- > From: Lionscribe [mailto:lionscr...@gmail.com]

RE: webOS SDK

2009-07-01 Thread Philip Sheard
Yes, that pisses me off too. -Original Message- From: Lionscribe [mailto:lionscr...@gmail.com] Sent: 01 July 2009 21:56 To: Palm Developer Forum Subject: Re: webOS SDK Well, Luis seems to be upset that Palm seems to be favoring a few large developers by giving them a runaway lead in

Re: webOS SDK

2009-07-01 Thread Lionscribe
Well, Luis seems to be upset that Palm seems to be favoring a few large developers by giving them a runaway lead in developing for the Pre, while us smalltime but feriously loyal developers, were completely IGNORED, with not even a glimpse or a passing mention. -- For information on using the

RE: webOS SDK

2009-07-01 Thread Lee Church
com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 10:39 AM To: Palm Developer Forum Subject: Re: webOS SDK Philip Sheard wrote: > And I remember having to sign umpteen forms in triplicate, in order to get a > glimpse of the source code for Palm OS 3.5. > Because OS source code == sdk. Ryan

Re: webOS SDK

2009-07-01 Thread Ryan Rix
Philip Sheard wrote: And I remember having to sign umpteen forms in triplicate, in order to get a glimpse of the source code for Palm OS 3.5. Because OS source code == sdk. Ryan -- For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.access-compan

RE: webOS SDK

2009-07-01 Thread Philip Sheard
And I remember having to sign umpteen forms in triplicate, in order to get a glimpse of the source code for Palm OS 3.5. -Original Message- From: Roger Stringer [mailto:strin...@rf-tp.com] Sent: 01 July 2009 16:24 To: Palm Developer Forum Subject: RE: webOS SDK At 03:15 AM 7/1/2009, you

RE: webOS SDK

2009-07-01 Thread Roger Stringer
At 03:15 AM 7/1/2009, you wrote: Subject: RE: webOS SDK From: luis maldonado Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:08:43 -0400 This conversation might be inappropriate for this forum but the fact is that Palm and their arrogance and the way they are thowing away a group of loyal developers turns me off

RE: webOS SDK

2009-06-30 Thread luis maldonado
I wouldn't beg those tweets if they paid me... Yeah! iPhone and iTouch rule.. Luis. > Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:26:51 -0400 > To: palm-dev-forum@news.palmos.com > From: strin...@rf-tp.com > Subject: Re: webOS SDK > > I'm not sure what you mean about &

Re: webOS SDK (PalmSDK-Win-0 3 4)

2009-06-30 Thread Christopher Stamper
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Regis St-Gelais < regis.st-gel...@laubrass.com> wrote: > "Lionscribe" a écrit dans le message de news: > 187...@palm-dev-forum... > >And IMHO if Ale would make an iPhone SDK that can be used on Windows, they > >will be even more successful. > >I would love to dev

Re: webOS SDK (PalmSDK-Win-0 3 4)

2009-06-30 Thread Regis St-Gelais
"Lionscribe" a écrit dans le message de news: 187...@palm-dev-forum... >And IMHO if Ale would make an iPhone SDK that can be used on Windows, they >will be even more successful. >I would love to develop for the iPhone, but I don't own a Mac. Same here -- Regis St-Gelais www.laubrass.com -

Re: webOS SDK

2009-06-30 Thread Lionscribe
This forum is basicaly dead from a Palm OS (Access) prespective, and probably will soon be used only for tinkering Palm OS applications to make them better suited for the Classic emulator. That is except if Dimitry gets DGOS running :-) -- For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forum

Re: webOS SDK

2009-06-30 Thread Roger Stringer
I'm not sure what you mean about "the way Palm do business", but keep in mind that WinMo, in its current form, is a dead OS. Palm have said they are progressively extending the group of developers which access to the SDK from "hundreds to thousands". PS: This discussion is an inappropriate use

RE: webOS SDK (PalmSDK-Win-0 3 4)

2009-06-30 Thread Philip Sheard
Palm has completely put me off, the way they have mucked about with the release of their SDK. What on earth are they playing at? It just beggars description. -- For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/

Re: webOS SDK (PalmSDK-Win-0 3 4)

2009-06-30 Thread Lionscribe
And IMHO if Ale would make an iPhone SDK that can be used on Windows, they will be even more successful. I would love to develop for the iPhone, but I don't own a Mac. -- For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.access-company.com/developers

Re: webOS SDK (PalmSDK-Win-0 3 4)

2009-06-29 Thread JamesSturdevant
codemaker wrote: webOS SDK (PalmSDK-Win-0 3 4) --- http://www.mininova.org/tor/2719050 OR http://rapidshare.com/files/249167601/PalmSDK-Win-0.3.4.exe I have just downloaded it... I didn’t test it. Good Luck I’m not thrilled to develop for Palm due to the way

Re: webOS SDK (PalmSDK-Win-0 3 4)

2009-06-29 Thread Ben Rittgers
codemaker wrote: webOS SDK (PalmSDK-Win-0 3 4) --- http://www.mininova.org/tor/2719050 OR http://rapidshare.com/files/249167601/PalmSDK-Win-0.3.4.exe I have just downloaded it... I didn’t test it. Good Luck I’m not thrilled to develop for Palm due to the way

Re: webOS SDK (PalmSDK-Win-0 3 4)

2009-06-29 Thread codemaker
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:02 AM, codemaker wrote: webOS SDK �(PalmSDK-Win-0 3 4) --- http://www.mininova.org/tor/2719050 OR http://rapidshare.com/files/249167601/PalmSDK-Win-0.3.4.exe I have just downloaded it... I didn�t test it. >

Re: webOS SDK (PalmSDK-Win-0 3 4)

2009-06-29 Thread Christopher Stamper
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 7:02 AM, codemaker wrote: > webOS SDK (PalmSDK-Win-0 3 4) > --- > http://www.mininova.org/tor/2719050 > OR > http://rapidshare.com/files/249167601/PalmSDK-Win-0.3.4.exe > I have just downloaded it... I didn’t test it. > (You just admit