On Wed 2010-06-09 (18:17), Steffen Mueller wrote:
> Maybe it's sufficient to add "-l eay32_" to the pp invocation? If not,
> you can try with the explicit path. Funny dll name, by the way.
I tried it with
pp -gui -clean -l eay32_ -o schwuppdiwupp.exe schwuppdiwupp.pl
where the resulting schwup
Hi Ulli,
Ulli Horlacher wrote:
My application (*) does https communication. How can I tell pp to include this
libeay32_.dll?
pp has the -l option for this purpose:
-l, --link=FILE|LIBRARY
Add the given shared library (a.k.a. shared object or DLL) into the
packed file. Also accepts names und
With the help of Roderich Schupp I was able to install PAR-Packer-1.005
(had problems with dmake) on strawberry perl 5.12 Windows XP.
I can use pp to produce Windows executables which can be run on other
Windows machines without an installed Perl, even Tk is working!
But compiled programs with "
> As already mentioned I use Strawberryperl so dmake is what I use.
Yes, the build problem seems specific for dmake - CPAN test results show that
*nix platforms are OK. It will be a few days until I will have time to dig
further.
Cheers, Roderich
On 09.06.2010, at 10:28, Xaero wrote:
> I'm s
Wed Jun 09 05:39:28 2010: Request 58266 was acted upon.
Transaction: Ticket created by frams...@rus.uni-stuttgart.de
Queue: PAR-Packer
Subject: install PAR::Packer failed for strawberry perl 5.12.0.1
(parldyn.exe not found)
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Owner
I'm sorry, i'm quite new to using a bug tracker, or usenet or even perl and to
programming in general. It looked liked the same issue i was having and so I
replied to it.
I don't think if I replied to the group Ulli would receive this message but I'm
not sure so: This is the sequece of commands
Wed Jun 09 03:21:16 2010: Request 57852 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by roderich.sch...@googlemail.com
Queue: PAR-Packer
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #57852] install PAR::Packer failed for
strawberry perl 5.12.0.1
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: (no value)
Hi all,
I'm taking this reply off the bug tracker since this isn't related to
the bug.
Ulli Horlacher via RT wrote:
I cannot see if the mail is coming from a maintainer or a user.
I thought RT-replies are always from the maintainers?
There is only a very fine line between a maintainer and a
