Hi,
Is there any way to turn on debug information (i.e. vtkObject::DebugOn())
for a filter on the server from the client side proxy? As far as I can
tell, all of the debug methods are for proxies and other things on the
client.
Thanks,
Andy
___
Powered
Hmm, I'm not sure this is the proper way to do it since I get a warning but
it appears to work:
a = GetActiveSource() # requires a leaf of the pipeline tree to be selected
Delete(a)
The warning I get is:
ERROR: In
C:\DBD\pvs-x64\paraview\src\paraview\ParaViewCore\ServerManager\Core\vtkSMProxyListD
in
> serial? I only get problems running in parallel.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Andy Bauer wrote:
>
>> The point data arrays are probably ordered differently on separate blocks
>> or there are different point data arrays on different blocks. My suggestion
>
The point data arrays are probably ordered differently on separate blocks
or there are different point data arrays on different blocks. My suggestion
is to use a python programmable filter to remove the unneeded arrays or to
reorder them.
Andy
On Monday, December 2, 2013, Ben Colcord wrote:
> He
Hi Hong,
Can you describe the type of view you're trying to output? If I remember
correctly it was volume rendering of an image data. Also, some details on
the grid would be helpful.
As for the parallel XML polydata writer, we were talking about changing it
so that it would only write out files f
Hi,
Can you share the file and give a description of what's in it?
Andy
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:16 PM, ganny.frederic
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As described in Paraview's documentation.The version 4.0.1 includes a rst
> reader.
>
> I ran a structural analysis on ANSYS 14.5 and try to read the rst
;, so I have a six digit
> zero padded integer followed by six zeros for the number (this is partly
> due to the software that I use to generate the files over which I have
> limited control).
>
> Kind regards
> Les
>
> On 23 Oct 2013, at 19:49, Andy Bauer wrote:
>
&
What is your numbering convention? The actual file series reader will time
step through the files in the order they are added so you could use a
Python script to load them in the order you want to.
Regards,
Andy
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Lesleis Nagy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently at
e with triangle), the rendered image will be copied
> to my local pipeline (like builtin) and I can operate on this local
> pipeline such as adding filter, is that right?
>
> Best wishes,
> Junyi Han
>
>
> 2013/10/21 Andy Bauer
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The Cataly
communication between two running jobs on
> HPC.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,
>
> ** **
>
> Hong
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* paraview-boun...@paraview.org [mailto:
> paraview-boun...@paraview.org] *On Behalf Of *Andy Bauer
> *Sent:* Monday, October 21, 2013 2:04 P
Hi,
The Catalyst live mode is still beta functionality. The client does connect
to the Catalyst enabled simulation directly. You have to keep in mind that
there's a pipeline on the server and a separate pipeline on the client.
Essentially the pipeline on the client uses the requested filter output
;
> Thanks again
>
> *Dennis Conklin**
> RDE & Q Senior Engineer *
> *Engineering Mechanics**
> *The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
> 200 Innovation Way, Akron, OH 44316
> phone.330-796-5701
> dennis_conk...@goodyear.com
>
>
>
>
>
> From
Hi,
Where did you get the example from?
I think your confusion is from the difference between multiblock data sets
and regular data sets. The regular data set has points and the Programmable
Filter gives a shortcut to access those points by using inputs[0].Points
and output.Points but there is no
Hi Rick,
The attached pvsc file should have the proper syntax for using plink on
windows. You'll need to fill in the stuff I cleaned out.
Regards,
Andy
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL
(US) wrote:
> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
> Caveats: NONE
>
>
Hi,
I think this is an issue with the set up of your cluster. Unless ParaView
uses OSMesa to do rendering it needs a window for rendering.
Regards,
Andy
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:40 AM, 谢茂金 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> ** **
>
> I'm annoying by a Paraview catalyst problem. When doing parallel live dat
Yeah, I glanced through that before but I guess I should have read through
it more thoroughly.
Thanks,
Andy
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Moreland, Kenneth wrote:
> You mean like this?
>
> http://www.sandia.gov/~kmorel/documents/IceTAtScale.pdf
>
>
> -Ken
>
>
Hi,
I can't say for sure but my first guess is that it's an issue with the
Python installation that you're using. ParaView won't work with Python 3.0.
I'd suggest trying out the ParaView Superbuild (
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView/Superbuild) which will build all required
dependencies as well.
Hi Ken,
Have you ever done any performance models for IceT? It would be for a
fairly simple problem of a 3d image data and volume rendering point data.
Thanks,
Andy
___
Powered by www.kitware.com
Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
http://www.
g linking orders. Let me
> know if you have ideas on what I could try to figure out and resolve this
> issue.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,
>
> ** **
>
> Hong
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> *Sent:
ages. Will have to
> debug and investigate more to find out more on that.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hong
>
>
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 01, 2013 2:19 PM
>
> *To:*
t_link_libraries. What I did is to go to src
> directory in the cross target and modified CMakeLists.txt for
> PhastaAdaptor, then went to corresponding paraview-build directory, and did
> "make clean" followed by "make" to rebuild PhastaAdaptor lib. Is there
>
Hi Bill,
I'd suggest looking at the settings at
http://open.cdash.org/viewNotes.php?buildid=3043527. Burlen set up that
dashboard for building on Hopper at NERSC and I often check his settings
when I try to do other Cray builds. It may not be exactly what you need but
it should be fairly close.
R
oprocessing script is
> executed, but not sure whether this is the case or not.
>
>
>
> Thanks for any suggestions!
>
>
> Hong
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* David E DeMarle [mailto:dave.dema...@kitware.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 26, 2013 1:28 PM
> *To:* A
Did you use a plugin to add in your custom filter when creating the Python
co-processing script? I'm not sure how plugins are "loaded" for static
builds but you may want to look at
http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView/Plugin_HowTo#Plugins_in_Static_Applications.
If that doesn't work, we'll have to
iew_DIR and it still can’t find the header files. However, I found
> that if I go into the Adaptors directory I can build libPhastaAdaptor.a***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> Do I need to be building my projects inside of the $cross/paraview/src
> tree?
>
> ** **
>
> Mark
&g
If I remember correctly, FindMPI.cmake is trying to set the language
specific libraries (e.g. MPI_CXX_LIBRARIES) and if those aren't set then it
will try to find them and finally overwrite what is in MPI_LIBRARY. So I
would suggest changing what Dave D. suggested with
MPI_{C,CXX,Fortran}_LIBRARIES
>
> ** **
>
> Mark****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 11, 2013 5:12 PM
> *To:* Vanmoer, Mark W
> *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] include paths for building examples with
> superbuild***
There is a webpage on the calculator filter at:
http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView/Users_Guide/Calculator
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Rafael Castro wrote:
> Time ago I asked for help to visualise isocurves like this pictures
> using wind speed data:
> http://i.imgur.com/OmUXWWj.png
>
>
I would suggest just setting the ParaView path to /paraview/src/paraview-build. This of course assumes that you're
executable is built with CMake such that it can get the include paths from
there. If not, maybe someone else can chime in with how to build the
paraviewsdk with superbuild.
Andy
On
Hi,
If I remember correctly, the CFortranInterface utility essentially works in
a separate process space so that it doesn't affect any of the CMake
settings for the current configuration. This may be a better topic for the
CMake list. I'll check with some people today to see about what could be
do
Good afternoon all,
We’d like to announce an upcoming webinar, ParaView Catalyst: Leverage *in
situ* Analysis with VTK and ParaView. The free webinar will be on September
26 from 2:00-3:00 EDT (and it will be recorded and posted to the website if
you can't join us live).
Hosted by Kitware, this f
Catalyst libs. Let me know if
> you, David, or anybody else can confirm whether this is the case, or offer
> any ideas/suggestions.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,
>
> ** **
>
> Hong
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.co
Hi Hong,
I think it's the Fortran mangling of the names. Try taking out the
underscore on the Fortran subroutine calls. Let me know if that doesn't
help. Otherwise it may be an issue with how C/Fortran mangles things. The
GCC behavior should be the following:
Fortran -> call xyz()
C -> void xyz_(
* paraview-boun...@paraview.org [mailto:
> paraview-boun...@paraview.org] *On Behalf Of *Hong Yi
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 28, 2013 12:44 PM
> *To:* Andy Bauer
>
> *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] cannot find -lvtkPVPythonCatalyst error when
> doing copro
Hi Hong,
The Catalyst User's Guide corresponds to ParaView 4.0 and later. You're
correct that for 3.98 you'll need to link to one of the CoProcessing
libraries. If I recall correctly, you should use:
TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES(phastaIC.exe vtkCoProcessorImplementation)
If that doesn't work, can you
I
> wonder if you could adapt/build on this solution there to solve your issue
> here?
>
> http://vtk.org/Bug/view.php?id=12179
>
> http://vtk.1045678.n5.nabble.com/tensor-glyph-inward-pointing-surface-normals-td4388361.html
>
> Burlen
>
>
> On 08/23/2013 01:10 PM, An
Hi Paul,
Apologies as my math is a bit rusty but isn't the sign of the eigenvector
related to the sign of its corresponding eigenvalue? In that case if you
make sure that all of the eigenvalues are positive then all of their
corresponding eigenvectors should be aligned properly. If that's the case
Hi Mark,
There are other people interested in this as well since as you point out it
can be a bit of a waste to move data from the GPU to the CPU and then back
to the GPU. I don't know anyone that is working on this problem yet either
but it will be a necessary improvement that eventually should b
Hi Matt,
The Tecplot binary files are loaded into ParaView through the VisIt bridge.
I'm checking on the VisIt list to see if they can do that and if they can,
then we can incorporate that properly into ParaView. I'll keep you posted
on any progress.
Thanks for the info.
Andy
On Mon, Aug 19, 2
The temporal statistics filter has an option for computing min and max on a
point by point and cell by cell basis. You can look at the range of that
result to find the global min and max over space and time.
Andy
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Brian Curtis wrote:
> I have code that reads in m
Hi,
With today's gatekeeper review, the way reader and writer plugins are
handled in ParaView has changed. Now, they only need to be specified on the
server through the server manager XML. The Hints section of the XML
specifies what extensions to associate with the reader or the writer. The
advant
Hi Mark,
The adaptor is meant to convert a simulation code's data structures into
something that derives from vtkDataObject. So the adaptor could have a RAW
binary file passed in and produce a vtkImageData for your case. As far as
the Catalyst Python script is concerned, all it is expecting at for
, Crinkleslice=0,
> SliceOffsetValues=[0.0], Triangulatetheslice=1, SliceType="Plane" )
>
> NameError: name 'Slice' is not defined
>
> ** **
>
> Okay, is this because of what you’re talking about below, Utkarsh? That
> the Catalyst build won’t nece
Utkarsh,
Is it worth the trouble to get rid of these error messages in Catalyst?
Also, the most up-to-date version of the user's guide is at
http://paraview.org/Wiki/images/4/48/CatalystUsersGuide.pdf.
Andy
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote:
Hi Mark
The environment should be set up automatically for you such that it can
find these modules. Can you share your adaptor code and Python code? You
could try the Fortran90 example at
https://github.com/acbauer/CatalystExampleCode to see how that behaves.
Regards,
Andy
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013
ything wrong with the file that would be greatly
> appreciated. It seems to conform with the legacy standard.
>
> Many Thanks
> Hayan
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Andy Bauer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ParaView is built on top of VTK so it can open le
vtkStringArray derives directly from vtkAbstractArray and not vtkDataArray
so you need to use:
*print input.GetPointData().GetAbstractArray("hop")*
Andy
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Yves Rogez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to pass string arrays stored in vtkPolyData sets through the
> pipe
Hi,
ParaView is built on top of VTK so it can open legacy VTK files. I suspect
that the legacy VTK files got corrupted somehow. How were the files
created? Can you share one of the files so someone else can test it?
Regards,
Andy
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Hayan Nasser wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hi,
I don't know any ParaView reader that is specific to OVERFLOW but I know in
the past we've processed OVERFLOW results in ParaView. What are the output
formats for OVERFLOW? I'm guessing it probably outputs in one of the
Tecplot or Ensight formats which ParaView should be able to handle. A
non-
.0/libvtkParallelMPI-pv4.0.so.1(_ZN16vtkMPIController25InitializeRMICommunicatorEv+0x13)
> [0x7f4627fda9b3]
> [mdlslx07:16411] [ 6]
> /home/fhoussen/Programs/Paraview/ParaView-v4.0.1-build/local/lib/paraview-4.0/libvtkParallelMPI-pv4.0.so.1(_ZN16vtkMPIControllerD2Ev+0x1d)
> [0x7f4627fdab1d]
&g
Hi,
I didn't have any problems using a vtkSmartPointer for vtkCPProcessor. I'd
have to see your full code to know for sure but my guess is that
_spProcessor is a pointer to a vtkCPProcessor and not a
vtkSmartPointer. When I make that mistake I get a crash.
Regards,
Andy
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 4:
er forum – as the
> main Elmer developer is on holiday at the moment, there might be more
> action from their side after the summer holidays.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Matthias
>
>
>
> *Von:* Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> *Gesendet:*
ient = paraview running on a
> laptop). As far as I understand, with a Python script I can generate output
> to post-process while the simulation is running, but I can not control it
> (stop, run, step, select more or less stuffs to save for the current time
> iteration), right ?
>
&g
in case
> they are interested?
>
> Matthias
>
> > Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:48:42 -0400
> > From: Andy Bauer
> > Subject: [Paraview] ParaView Catalyst User's Guide version 1.0
> > To: paraview@paraview.org
> > Message-ID:
> >> mail.gma
> Thanks,
>
> Alan
>
> From: Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 2:24 PM
> To: Scott, W Alan
> Cc: paraview@paraview.org
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Paraview] Integration of a 3d space onto a plane?
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> I was worki
Hi Alan,
I was working on a filter that was similar to this. If I remember correctly
it could handle both vtkRectilinearGrids and vtkImageDatas (it definitely
couldn't handle vtkStructuredGrids, vtkPolyDatas or vtkUnstructuredGrids).
It also worked in parallel (or was supposed to). I never quite p
/11.1/056/bin/intel64/icc
>
>
> --
> Rick Angelini
>
> USArmy Research Laboratory
> CISD/HPC Architectures Team
> Building 120 Cube 315
> Phone: 410-278-6266
>--
> *From:* Andy Bauer [andy.ba...@
Hi Rick,
You may be able to set your CXX and CC environment variables in the shell
your building in to get what you want. I don't know enough about the Qt
build system though to know if it will then use those compilers but I'm
optimistic enough to think it will :)
Regards,
Andy
On Fri, Jun 21, 2
Hi Bill,
The issues with the live connection to Catalyst from the ParaView GUI
should now be fixed. Let me know if you get any weird issues with it.
Regards,
Andy
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Bill Sherman wrote:
> On 06/06/2013 02:10 PM, Andy Bauer wrote:
>
>> Hi Bill,
>
It kind of looks like something funky is still going on with this, at least
for using the system MPI. In my superbuild cmake cache I get the following
for MPI_C_LIBRARIES:
/usr/lib/libmpich.so;/usr/lib/libopa.so;/usr/lib/libmpl.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so;/usr/lib/libcr.so;/usr/lib/x86_64
% git show HEAD
>> commit 723b5455491ef913ed1083f75e34c2**820d1f06e8
>>
>>
>> Merge: d915ca0 3e6ceec
>> Author: Utkarsh Ayachit > <mailto:utkarsh.ayachit@**kitware.com
>> >
>> <mailto:utkarsh.ayachit@_
Date: Fri May 24 10:41:11 2013 -0400
>>
>> Merge topic 'update_version_rc2'
>>
>> 3e6ceec Update version to 4.0.0-RC2
>>
>> So I guess that's a slightly different commit than what you were
>> testing against -- but I do
ed it 05/28/13, so only one day
> difference.
>
> I can try a newer (or different) version of ParaView, but I'm not
> sufficiently familiar with git to know how to request a specific
> commit code.
>
> Recommendations?
>
> Andy
>>
>
> Thank you,
One possibility is ParaView Catalyst's live viz capability (
http://catalyst.paraview.org/). At this point I would consider it beta
functionality for it's intended purpose but it may be sufficient for what
you're trying to do. I'm attaching a Python script that you can demo it
with. You'll need to
wrote:
> Lucas, Andy,
>
> Thank you both for your responses.
>
>
> On 05/29/2013 12:42 PM, Andy Bauer wrote:
>
>> Hi Bill & Lucas,
>>
>> I was on vacation the last several days and am now finally catching up.
>>
>> Thanks for the info on th
Hi Bill & Lucas,
I was on vacation the last several days and am now finally catching up.
Thanks for the info on the examples not working with the 4.0 release
candidates. I haven't tested them in a while so it's possible that
something is out of sync. As Lucas mentioned, Catalyst had quite a bit o
Hi,
It's a sub-proxy that is used to define the probe location. The name of
that is FixedRadiusPointSource. You can find that in filters.xml (partly
shown below). The proxy definition of FixedRadiusPointSource is in
utilities.xml (also partly shown below).
Hope this points you in the proper direc
nks for looking into this. I am using ParaView version 3.98.1 and the
> attached is the co-processing script that I used. Let me know if you have
> any further questions or find something I did not do correctly.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks again,
>
> ** **
>
> Hong ***
Hi Hong,
I'm not able to reproduce this issue with the ParaView head version. What
version of ParaView are you using and can you share your script?
Thanks,
Andy
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Hong Yi wrote:
> I observed when I build a pipeline that includes two slice views and
> export it
I should also add that the Fortran sample script hasn't been updated yet to
ParaView head but the CxxFullExample sample script has. That's a
possibility between the two.
Andy
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Andy Bauer wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Was there any output? What hap
Hi Lucas,
Was there any output? What happens when you build the C++ example with
USE_CATALYST set to OFF?
I'm not having any issues on my workstation with that example with the
latest version of ParaView and Catalyst examples so I'll need a bit of help
diagnosing the problem.
Thanks,
Andy
On T
not
> the one that I wanted.
>
> Thanks
> Lucas
>
>
> From: Andy Bauer [andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:28 PM
> To: Pettey . Lucas
> Cc: paraview@paraview.org
> Subject: Re: [Paraview] Initialize coprocessor f
n when running it in-situ (without live feed at this
> point), the only way I can think of is through the disk output for the
> users to observe, or is there another way?
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks again,
>
> ** **
>
> Hong
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andy
Hi Lucas,
Every process should call coprocessorinitializewithpython(). I'm not sure
how to solve this but first off maybe trying the Fortran 90 example at
https://github.com/acbauer/CatalystExampleCode may help simplify the
problem. What machine are you trying this on and what version of ParaView
essors it runs on.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for any more information you can provide!****
>
> ** **
>
> Hong
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 25, 2013 7:43 PM
> *To:* Hong Yi
> *Cc:* paraview
Hi,
The parallel XML data set writers all write independently of each other (no
MPI communication is needed in the writers). Because of this they can't
tell process 0 when writing it's meta-data file that it doesn't need to
write out meta data for them.
Andy
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Hon
Hi,
You may want to look at Catalyst (catalyst.paraview.org). There is some
ability to interact live with simulation data and that's something I'm
hoping to improve upon in the near future. It may not be exactly what
you're looking for but it's the closest thing that I can think of.
Andy
On Wed
est way
> to proceed at this point.
>
> ** **
>
> Many thanks as always,
>
> ** **
>
> Best,
>
> ** **
>
> Hong
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* paraview-boun...@paraview.org [mailto:
> paraview-boun...@paraview.org] *On Behalf O
Hi,
The mask points filter gets rid of all of the cells so there is no way for
the stream tracer filter to find velocity values at arbitrary points in the
domain. The best way is to find a machine with more memory to run on.
Barring this, you'll have to reduce the size of your data set in some way
Hi Hong,
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't Phasta built with CMake? If it is, in
CMakeLists.txt you can do something like:
find_package(ParaView REQUIRED)
include("${PARAVIEW_USE_FILE}")
...
If not, I would suggest creating a simple executable and build it with
CMake and see what libraries are li
er pvserver instance as
> Paraview server from the Paraview install directory that the client
> connects to, but rather to connect to the pvserver instance from Catalyst
> as live data source? I am hoping to frame my question with not too much
> confusion, and hoping to clear up the conf
fusion in my head by some quick
> answer from you.
>
> ** **
>
> Again, looking forward to the Catalyst Users Guide to be out soon!
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,
>
> ** **
>
> Hong
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andy Bauer [mailto:a
It's not meant to be edited. I just delete it when I figure out that's the
problem but that is very rare.
Andy
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Paw Møller wrote:
> > try running with the -dr option
> That did the trick. Thank you.
>
> Deleted the registry file from ~/.config/Paraview, but I was
I'm not able to reproduce this issue. It might be that your registry is
causing problems. Can you try running with the -dr option which disables
the registry (i.e. "forgets" any previous settings you may have saved in
ParaView)?
Andy
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Paw Møller wrote:
> Forgot t
Could you share your generated file? I'm not sure why the rescale to data
range is scaling it to the range [0,1]. Also, what version of ParaView are
you using?
Modifying the file won't cause ParaView to reread it as the reader will not
notice that the time stamp on the file has changed.
Andy
On
You're missing the vtkPointData header file so you just need to add:
#include "vtkPointData.h"
Andy
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Paw Møller wrote:
> Thanks for the answer Joe,
>
> but I still get a compilation error for
>
> rgrid->GetPointData()->AddArray(temperature);
>
> The error:
> inval
43 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit <
utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> wrote:
> That variable was recently changed in VTK (check with Kyle) to
> VTK_INTEGER_MAX. JUst replace them accordingly.
>
> Utkarsh
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Andy Bauer
> wrote:
> > Do any of the
Hi Manav,
Currently there is no way to do this in parallel as VTK doesn't have the
concept of a hanging node. Thus when a cell looks to see if there is a
neighbor on its side it sees if any other cell's sides matches those same
points. If no other cell's sides has those same set of points then it
Remember that VTK starts numbering at 0 instead of 1.
I think you need to change the cell part to (I may have a typo but you get
the idea):
8 0 1 7 6 5 4 10 11
8 1 2 8 7 4 3 9 10
Andy
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Sebastien Jourdain <
sebastien.jourd...@kitware.com> wrote:
> Did you doubl
Do any of the dashboards build the VisIt bridge? I'm getting the compile
error below with PV master but I don't see any dashboard issues.
Andy
In file included from
/home/acbauer/CODE/ParaView/ParaView/Utilities/VisItBridge/Library/VisItLib/visit_vtk/lightweight/vtkVisItCellLocator.C:18:0:
/home/
Hi,
FYI: We now generate installers for ParaView nightly for git HEAD. They're
available at http://www.paraview.org/paraview/resources/software.php and by
choosing Nightly for Version of ParaView.
Andy
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Burlen Loring wrote:
> Hi afad sfgsfdgsfd,
>
> Fixes for
Hi Lucas,
Do you mind if I use the coproc files you sent me as an example for
Catalyst?
Thanks,
Andy
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Andy Bauer wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> I was able to replicate your issue on the mac. There is a fix for it that
> is waiting a code review and dashbo
Hi Lucas,
I was able to replicate your issue on the mac. There is a fix for it that
is waiting a code review and dashboard feedback. I'll let you know when
it's in the main ParaView repo (which should be a couple of days).
Andy
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Andy Bauer wrote:
Hi Lucas,
I'm getting rid of the history as it was getting really long and making it
hard to read.
There is a bug with the vtkMPIImageReader --
http://paraview.org/Bug/view.php?id=13968. I think it should be fixed in a
couple of days.
I'm not getting the issues with the script that was in the ta
I do "git submodule update --init".
Andy
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Pettey . Lucas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been working with Andy on some CoProcessing issues and need to pull
> from the repository.
>
> I did this Friday with no issues, but I wanted to check out a fresh copy
> today. Wh
:
> Sorry, Andy, that didn't seem to work either.
>
> Let me know what information would be useful to print.
>
> Thanks
> Lucas
>
> ____
> From: Andy Bauer [andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 2:36 PM
> To: P
2013 at 3:31 PM, Pettey . Lucas wrote:
> Yes I did. I have attached the latest script.
>
> Thank you for your valiant efforts in trying to solve this problem.
>
> Lucas
>
> ____
> From: Andy Bauer [andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March
th the simulation code. At that point, I might have
> more specific questions.
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks again,
>
> ** **
>
> Hong
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 21, 2013 1:5
Thanks,
> Lucas
>
> ________
> From: paraview-boun...@paraview.org [paraview-boun...@paraview.org] on
> behalf of Andy Bauer [andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 12:49 PM
> To: Pettey . Lucas
> Cc: paraview [paraview@paraview.org]
>
Hi Hong,
The live data source that was done with ParaView 3.14 really was just a
demo. It's evolved and has been improved for ParaView 3.98. Not it's in the
Tools->Connect to Catalyst GUI menu.
Catalyst is indeed the evolution of what we called the co-processing tools
in older versions of ParaVie
401 - 500 of 774 matches
Mail list logo
