What's the current method to implement active stereo in Paraview (3.2.x
or 3.4.x)? I don't see any configuration option through ccmake, and
an archive search points to a variety of different source file
modifications, none of which seem to be consistent or current.
I'm a bit surprised that
What's the trick for searching the mail list archives I can never
remember and I can't find the magic on the wiki or website I found
this reference, but could not find the search tool
"The mailing list archives can be searched using the search tool
provided above. You may want to
Does this mean that we're inching closer to the next production release?
Berk Geveci wrote:
Hi folks,
I just branched for ParaView 3.4. The branch tag is ParaView-3-4. The
branch point it ParaView-3-4-bp.
-berk
___
ParaView mailing list
ParaView@para
ulty.
Thanks
Burlen
Rick Angelini(CISD/CIV) wrote:
> So, you have a dataset that duplicates the problem?
>
> Burlen Loring wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rick,
>>
>> Looks like it's in the reader, as rolling back all of the changes
>> between now and then fixes. I'll se
rlen
Rick Angelini(CISD/CIV) wrote:
> I have a CTH 8.1 dataset that I'm loading up using a development
> version of Paraview. When I load up the data and use the "Extract
> CTH Parts" filter, everything seems to work fine with the exception of
> some unexpected holes in
I have a CTH 8.1 dataset that I'm loading up using a development version
of Paraview. When I load up the data and use the "Extract CTH Parts"
filter, everything seems to work fine with the exception of some
unexpected holes in the resulting geometry. Due to the shape of
the holes, I'd
Does this need to be reported as a bug?
Jean Favre wrote:
On 26, Aug 2008 09:58 PM, Rick Angelini(CISD/CIV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>When I fire up pvserver and connect back to the client, and load up
>some
>geometry (max'd out sphere, for instance), I get a number
X
> server but no way for it to connect back to a display. Many warnings but
> it worked.
>
> Kent
> Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
>
> Kent
>
> Rick Angelini(CISD/CIV) wrote:
>> Is there an issue with offscreen rendering and mesa in the CVS? I'm
>> bu
rom pvserver instead of pvbatch.
We ran pvbatch with 256 nodes on an XT3 where there was not only no X
server but no way for it to connect back to a display. Many warnings
but it worked.
Kent
Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center
Kent
Rick Angelini(CISD/CIV) wrote:
Is there an issue with offscree
Is there an issue with offscreen rendering and mesa in the CVS? I'm
building Paraview from a CVS download from Monday. I'm configuring
this to run on one of our clusters that does not have GL cards and I
believe that I'm building against mesa.
When I fire up pvserver and connect back to
10 matches
Mail list logo