Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader

AM > > *To:* Gallagher, Timothy P > *Cc:* paraview@paraview.org > *Subject:* Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader > > Thanks, Tim. I'll take a look in next few days. > > Utkarsh > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Gallagher, Timothy P < > tim.gallag...@gatech.edu>

Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader

yac...@kitware.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 7:51 AM To: Gallagher, Timothy P Cc: paraview@paraview.org Subject: Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader Thanks, Tim. I'll take a look in next few days. Utkarsh On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Gallagher, Timothy P <tim.gallag...@g

Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader

paraview.org Subject: Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader Thanks for the quick response, the case didn't match between the two files and that was the issue. I'm able to use the reader to select the file and it sees the names of the variables in it properly, but when I hit Apply it thr

Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader

y P Cc: paraview@paraview.org Subject: Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader Tim, Did you also add it to visit_readers.xml [1]? The proxy definition should also have a section like so [2]. Utkarsh [1] https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/visitbridge/blob/master/databases/visit_readers.xml [2]

Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader

From: Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 12:17 PM To: Gallagher, Timothy P Cc: paraview@paraview.org Subject: Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader Tim, It doesn't know what the class is. Multiple things could have gone

Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader

ging paraview? Is there a > way to get more verbose output on why it isn't able to create the reader? > > > Thanks again, > > > Tim > > -- > *From:* Utkarsh Ayachit <utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com> > *Sent:* Monday, August 29, 2016 8:46 A

Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader

at wasn't > enough I guess. > > > Thanks, > > > Tim > > > -- > *From:* ParaView <paraview-boun...@paraview.org> on behalf of Gallagher, > Timothy P <tim.gallag...@gatech.edu> > *Sent:* Friday, August 26, 2016 11:53 AM > *To:* Utkarsh Ayachit

Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader

Sent: Friday, August 26, 2016 11:53 AM To: Utkarsh Ayachit Cc: paraview@paraview.org Subject: Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader Hi Utkarsh, I just checked with the latest head of the git repo and when I compile with the VisitBridge, there are no readers for BoxLib built. This page lists it

Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader

ubject: Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader Tim, I am not exactly sure what's the status of the reader, but I can certainly look it up. Do you have a sample dataset also to test that it's working (or not)? Utkarsh On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Gallagher, Timothy P <tim.gallag...@g

Re: [Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader

Tim, I am not exactly sure what's the status of the reader, but I can certainly look it up. Do you have a sample dataset also to test that it's working (or not)? Utkarsh On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 2:22 PM, Gallagher, Timothy P wrote: > Hi, > > > Our code is moving away

[Paraview] Status of BoxLib AMR reader

Hi, Our code is moving away from traditional structured grids towards an AMR capability using BoxLib. That means, unfortunately, that all of the development we have done to make our code Paraview and CoProcessing friendly is not usable with the BoxLib file format. I have seen some