Hi Mark,
The VTKm patch issue should be resolved in 5.5.2. I'd love to have the
Catalyst API changes in 5.5.2 but that's a bit much for a patch change. 5.6
will have it though and that's due out in September so people won't have to
wait too long for that.
Best,
Andy
On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 11:45
mapped to values >11, doesn’t appear to
> change anything.
>
>
>
> I’m also not seeing much in the way of performance variation when I use
> 13-256 cores, it’s only when I drop below 12 that things take appreciably
> longer.
>
>
>
> Is Paraview by default only taking
GL (or are they incompatible with
> certain other modules)?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Gregg
>
>
>
> *From:* Andy Bauer [mailto:andy.ba...@kitware.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 01, 2018 11:46 AM
> *To:* Gregg Streuber
> *Cc:* paraview@public.kitware.com
> *Subject:*
Hi Gregg,
You can always use a full build of ParaView for Catalyst to make sure you
get all of the filters available during Catalyst runs.
There is information at
https://blog.kitware.com/paraview-catalyst-editions-what-are-they/ which
gives details about the editions but there's currently not a
Hi Mark,
If you want to create images from Catalyst runs you'll probably want to
build the ParaView that you're linking to with either OSMesa or EGL (and Qt
disabled). This gets around needing the X context for rendering since I
believe running with offscreen enabled is not sufficient. EGL comes
Hi Petr,
Could you try adding in the following to your Python script after the
coprocessor.RegisterWriter() line:
writer.DataMode = 'Ascii'
Please let me know if that fixes the issue for you. This isn't the desired
fix but something to at least verify that I can reproduce your issue.
Thanks,
t it. Thanks, good explanation
> to both of you. I will close the bug I wrote.
>
>
>
> Thanks guys,
>
>
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> *From: *Shawn Waldon <shawn.wal...@kitware.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 3:09 PM
> *To: *Andy Bauer <andy.ba...@
<wasc...@sandia.gov> wrote:
> Again, does this then mean we should delete pvtm file formats Catalyst
> writers? I have a user that created a pvtm file recently, I believe using
> Catalyst…
>
>
>
> *From: *Andy Bauer <andy.ba...@kitware.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, May
a few questions. Where is the .pvtm file format
> documented? Google doesn’t know... Next, why have two redundant file
> formats? One should be deprecated. Why can Catalyst write this file
> format? And last, of course, why can’t ParaView read it?
>
>
>
> Alan
>
>
&g
The .pvtm is the same as the .vtm file, just a redundant file extension.
Really, the .vtm format is parallel/partition aware where as the other .vt*
extensions have a partitioned .pvt* format.
I'm a bit surprised that PV doesn't associate the .pvtm file with
multiblock datasets. If you try to
Hi Ufuk,
The threshold filter operates on scalar/single component arrays only. Also,
underneath the covers it operates on cell data exclusively so if you
request thresholding on point data it will do a point data to cell data
operation as well.
I'm not aware of any filters in PV that would allow
Any chance you could share the datasets and maybe a state file so that I
could try to reproduce your issue?
I can't think of anything off the top of my head that would case this.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Christian Adrián Álvarez Báez <
christian.alvarez...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
"integrate variable" filter. Then to extract all the
> time step values, I try to use the "plot selection over time" filter;
> however, Paraview crashes when I try to apply the "plot selection over
> time" filter.
>
> Any advice?
>
> Regards,
>
Hi John,
It depends on what type of grid you have. For image data, rectilinear grid
or structured grid the extract subset filter is probably the best (for
other grid types it will be grayed out since it's not applicable to those
grid types). Otherwise, you can use resample with dataset.
Note
ace that you indicate, the piece and whole extent is same in the
> files.
>
> Regards,
>
> --ufuk
>
>
> ------
> *From: *"Andy Bauer" <andy.ba...@kitware.com>
> *To: *"Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)" <u.utku.turunco...@be.i
works with 5.4.1? How it is handled by Catalyst in live mode? Do i
> have multiple visualization pipeline?
>
> Regards,
>
> --ufuk
>
>
> On 19.03.2018 13:36, Andy Bauer wrote:
>
> Hi Ufuk,
>
> Currently a multipiece data set always has to be nested under a multiblock
&
Hi Ufuk,
Currently a multipiece data set always has to be nested under a multiblock
dataset. This definitely seems like an unreasonable limitation on a
structured grid under a multipiece dataset but I suspect we just haven't
had the resources to put into making this work properly. My suggestion
Hi Simon,
Currently there's nothing that allows the coprocessor to get information
that the user has clicked on the extract icon during a Catalyst Live
connection. You may be able to hack in a solution though by looking at
either vtkLiveInSituLink (
bly send a few non-confidential screenshots if everything is
> working well).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Yvan
>
> On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 17:33 -0500, Andy Bauer wrote:
>
> Hi Yvan,
>
> The vtkPKdTree ones look like they could be after looking at the code,
> especially
Hi Yvan,
The vtkPKdTree ones look like they could be after looking at the code,
especially vtkPKdTree::InitializeRegionAssignmentLists(). It seems like a
good idea to replace the int **ProcessAssignmentMap with maybe a
std::vector. Probably a good idea for the other member variables here as
well.
The DivideCellDataByVolume only operates on cell data and you're
integrating a point data array so it won't work the way you're expecting it
to. You can use the point data to cell data filter and then try using the
integrate variable filter to see if that gives the result that you want.
On Mon,
21 matches
Mail list logo
