On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 18:21, Andrew Whitworth wrote:
> We have two branches that reached maturity today and are ready for a
> merge in to trunk. I want to run past the team first before anything
> gets merged anywhere.
>
excellent news. thanks for letting us know about it.
> The first, which we'
We have two branches that reached maturity today and are ready for a
merge in to trunk. I want to run past the team first before anything
gets merged anywhere.
The first, which we've already heard about, is bacek's context_pmc3
branch. This turns the Parrot_context structure into a new Context PMC
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Moritz Lenz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:56:39AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > LibJIT:
> > The only URL I've found,
> > http://www.southern-storm.com.au/libjit.html
> > doesn't seem to go anywhere useful anymore. That's doesn't seem
> > to be a goo
James E Keenan wrote:
isafast/
I think pmichaud++ already merged this branch into trunk.
pmc_i_ops/
This one is waiting to review by Allison.
pmc_pct/
This one is stalled but worth keeping.
--
Bacek.
___
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listin
Hi all,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> Here are a few random observations:
>
> Current JIT:
> Can anyone provide reasonable benchmarks for whether this actually
> provides any significant performance boost? (Obviously, this has
> to be done by someone on a pla
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 08:56:39AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Andrew Whitworth wrote:
>
> > In response to our discussion today in #ps, I have started drafting
> > some plans for implementing a proper JIT for Parrot. I have tried to
> > show several options for each step, e
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Current JIT:
> Can anyone provide reasonable benchmarks for whether this actually
> provides any significant performance boost? (Obviously, this has
> to be done by someone on a platform where it currently works.)
I had seen some nu
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Here are a few random observations:
>
> Gnu Lightning: According to the documentation:
>
> "The low number of available registers (six) is also an important
> limitation . . . ."
>
> Does anyone have a sense how well that would (or woul
On Tue, 1 Sep 2009, Andrew Whitworth wrote:
> In response to our discussion today in #ps, I have started drafting
> some plans for implementing a proper JIT for Parrot. I have tried to
> show several options for each step, each with pros and cons:
>
> https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/JITRewrit
