Re: [PATCH] Include info about out-of-order events for timezone unification

Hi, >- | > Unify timezones used -- use UTC for both email submissions and internal > -events. > +events. Please note that this change doesn't modify already existing data > +so in case the instance's timezone is UTC+XX, events will appear out of > +order (as if they

Re: [PATCH v3] Avoid timezone confusion

Stephen Finucane writes: > On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 16:24 +0100, vkaba...@redhat.com wrote: >> From: Veronika Kabatova >> >> Patchwork saves patches, comments etc with UTC timezone and reports >> this time when opening the patch details. However, internally

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Add test for list filtering feature

On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 14:34 +0100, vkaba...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Veronika Kabatova > > Signed-off-by: Veronika Kabatova Reviewed-by: Stephen Finucane and applied. ___ Patchwork

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Implement list filtering

On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 14:34 +0100, vkaba...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Veronika Kabatova > > Sometimes, multiple projects reside at the same mailing list. So far, > Patchwork only allowed a single project per mailing list, which made it > impossible for these projects to use

Re: [PATCH v3] Avoid timezone confusion

On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 16:24 +0100, vkaba...@redhat.com wrote: > From: Veronika Kabatova > > Patchwork saves patches, comments etc with UTC timezone and reports > this time when opening the patch details. However, internally generated > processes such as events are reported

Re: [PATCH] [RFC] tools: drop vagrant

On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 11:54 +, Stephen Finucane wrote: > On Sat, 2018-02-24 at 12:22 +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote: > > It served us well, but it's now outdated (Trusty, Python 3.4, etc) > > There is no indication that anyone uses it or keeps it up to date. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens

Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] parser: don't fail on multiple SeriesReferences

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 15:55 +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote: > Stephen Finucane writes: > > > On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 01:50 +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote: > > > Parallel parsing would occasonally fail with: > > > > > > patchwork.models.MultipleObjectsReturned: get() returned more than

Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] tools/scripts: split a mbox N ways

On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 15:49 +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote: > Stephen Finucane writes: > > > On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 01:50 +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote: > > > To test parallel loading of mail, it's handy to be able to split > > > an existing mbox file into N mbox files in an