, 2007 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Gary,
Do you have your computer incorporated into your Home Theater system?
That's
what I ultimately want to do, but when I did so a few months ago, my
computer screen didn't read well on a HD TV. The wife said all characters
: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 00:57:51 -0500
Hi Cornell! I haven't incorporated my computer with my home theater system
either, but I also hope to do so. I checked the B and K website, but didn't
find it very accessible.
- Original Message -
From
Thanks, Cornell!
- Original Message -
From: Cornell Ligon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Hi Gary,
I had the same experience on the BK audio site as well. I'll hold on to
this email
list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 00:49:33 -0500
Well I like my home theater system. I play my music in surround sound, as
well as watching movies with it, and I think it sounds pretty good. I have
a Pioneer system
-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 07:59:52 +0200
Hi Cornell
The Nad c320b is an integrated amplifier. I do not need a home theter
system so I went for a simple amplifier to listen to music.
This is a very simple integrated amp with no bells
list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
To: 'PC audio discussion list. ' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:19:37 +0200
Hi Kevin
The setup I use here is of course my PC with win xp and windows media
player 11.
I have a emagic emi 2/6 usb
Sent: 30 March 2007 04:48 PM
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Andre,
No, I understood what you were stating, but Im such a junky for audio
equipment in any capacity and Im familiar with Nads reputation for keeping
things simple without too many
Hi all
I know that I am now probably starting a rather difficult and perhaps
controversial thread, but I really want to get an answer to my questions.
1. Is there a difference in the audio quality between winamp and windows
media player? I like using windows media player but I do want the
-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:40 AM
Subject: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Hi all
I know that I am now probably starting a rather difficult and perhaps
controversial thread, but I really want to get an answer to my questions.
1. Is there a difference in the audio quality
-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 8:40 AM
Subject: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Hi all
I know that I am now probably starting a rather difficult and perhaps
controversial thread, but I really want to get an answer to my questions.
1
PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kevin Lloyd
Sent: 28 March 2007 08:55 PM
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Hi Andre.
In my opinion windows media player provides a better listen than winamp.
There's really very little difference but specifically if you
: Bruce Toews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I disagree with you about Windows Media. I feel it is the least
palatable of all the player options out
I'm not a fan of windows media either.
Allison
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Toews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I disagree with you about Windows
: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 04:10 PM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I'm not a fan of windows media either.
Allison
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Toews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:59 PM
Subject
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dana S. Leslie
Sent: 2007/03/28 12:32
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I agree with you, Bruce. Winamp sounds much better to me (with or without
equalizer) than either Windows Media Player
, March 28, 2007 8:40 AM
Subject: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Hi all
I know that I am now probably starting a rather difficult and perhaps
controversial thread, but I really want to get an answer to my questions.
1. Is there a difference in the audio quality between
Skarstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 05:40 PM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I think it all depends on your system. I remember
on my last system before this one, when I would
listen tto a live album
discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
To: 'PC audio discussion list. ' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:19:37 +0200
Hi Kevin
The setup I use here is of course my PC with win xp and windows media
player 11.
I have a emagic emi 2/6 usb
Follows
From: André van Deventer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: PC audio discussion list. pc-audio@pc-audio.org
To: 'PC audio discussion list. ' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:19:37 +0200
Hi Kevin
The setup I use here
to put it mildly!!
Andre
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Cornell Ligon
Sent: 29 March 2007 03:51 AM
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Hi,
is the Nad a power amp or a receiver? In other words, do
20 matches
Mail list logo
