versus the ipod
I'm not familiar with the newer models of the Zen Stone. The last one I
got was a 4G Zen Stone with External Speaker. Ray's right. It just shows
up as an external storage device, on your PC so you only need Windows
Explorer to copy music over to it. You don't need an application
Subject: Re: zenstone versus the ipod
Have you tried the Ipod Touch? Is it completely accessible and worth the
cost?
Sincerely,
Lauren
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Chaltain chalt...@gmail.com
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 14
with no buttons how do you manage?
- Original Message -
From: Constantine tcwoo...@shaw.ca
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: zenstone versus the ipod
Hi,
I have an IPhone, an IPod touch is the same thing just
versus the ipod
with no buttons how do you manage?
- Original Message -
From: Constantine tcwoo...@shaw.ca
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: zenstone versus the ipod
Hi,
I have an IPhone, an IPod touch is the same
Hi,
i am in the market for a player that I can use to play and download songs from.
I am wondering which is the most accessible for a totally blind person, has
good memory, is easy to sue and cost? I heard the Ipod touch is accessible, but
wonder if anyone has actual experience with it?
Lauren, the Zenstone, if it's still around, is far simpler than an Ipod
orItouch. The Zenstone's sound quality is good and there's not much of a
learning curv either. You can simply copy files or folders containgcontaining
.mp3 files to the Zenstone, whereas the Apple products I am pretty
Thanks for posting this, I had recommended the Zenstone in the past
but I was told that the newer models aren't accessible? I'm not sure
if this is true or not as I haven't seen one in a while but -
supposing it is - then an Ipod Nano - particularly one of the newer
models with Voiceover
I'm not familiar with the newer models of the Zen Stone. The last one I
got was a 4G Zen Stone with External Speaker. Ray's right. It just shows
up as an external storage device, on your PC so you only need Windows
Explorer to copy music over to it. You don't need an application like
itunes.
Well, I can say that I've tried the Zen Stone, which was a screenless
one; I've tried Rockbox on a Sansa; and I've tried a 4th generation
iPod Nano. IN the past, I had also tried a Samsung Pebble and a
chinese-made mp3 player, both of which were screenless. I have to say
that the Rockboxed Sansa
How much memory would you want? I have a new zen stone that I am
willing to sell.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 14, 2009, at 6:58 AM, Lauren lotusris...@att.net wrote:
Hi,
i am in the market for a player that I can use to play and download
songs from. I am wondering which is the most
: zenstone versus the ipod
Well, I can say that I've tried the Zen Stone, which was a screenless one;
I've tried Rockbox on a Sansa; and I've tried a 4th generation iPod Nano.
IN the past, I had also tried a Samsung Pebble and a chinese-made mp3
player, both of which were screenless. I have to say
, 2009 10:03 PM
Subject: RE: zenstone versus the ipod
I totally agree, and I've since retired my two Zen Stones in favor of a
Sansa e280 running Rockbox. However, a Zen Stone is going to be easier to
use and work right out of the box. If you're looking for the simplest and
cheapest off the shelf
, October 14, 2009 9:03 PM
Subject: RE: zenstone versus the ipod
I totally agree, and I've since retired my two Zen Stones in favor of a
Sansa e280 running Rockbox. However, a Zen Stone is going to be easier to
use and work right out of the box. If you're looking for the simplest and
cheapest off
13 matches
Mail list logo
