[pca] Pca Applying unnecessary patch

2008-04-17 Thread Cromwell, Ray, VF-IE
Hi , I applied a patch bundle to a Solaris 8 box and it included a patch for Solaris 9 . The box in question is part of a Sun cluster . It applied patch 114176-05 114176 -- < 05 --- 999 Sun Cluster 3.0: OPS Core Patch for Solaris 9 There is no mention of this patch in showrev -p and uname

Re: [pca] Pca Applying unnecessary patch

2008-04-17 Thread Martin Paul
Hi, It applied patch 114176-05 114176 -- < 05 --- 999 Sun Cluster 3.0: OPS Core Patch for Solaris 9 There is no mention of this patch in showrev -p and uname -a is -- > SunOS joebloggs 5.8 Generic_117350-38 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-880 Thanks for the report. It's incorrect behaviour - the

Re: [pca] Pca Applying unnecessary patch

2008-04-17 Thread Greg Matthews
Martin Paul wrote: Whenever such patches are reported to me, I add a workaround into pca itself. I've done that for 111857/114176 now as well in the current pca development release. The problem shouldn't show up again. Are new releases announced to this list? Is there a standard Subject heade

Re: [pca] Pca Applying unnecessary patch

2008-04-17 Thread Martin Paul
Greg Matthews wrote: Martin Paul wrote: Whenever such patches are reported to me, I add a workaround into pca itself. I've done that for 111857/114176 now as well in the current pca development release. The problem shouldn't show up again. Are new releases announced to this list? Is there a s

[pca] concurrent download threads

2008-04-17 Thread Martin Paul
I just put a new development release of pca online, with this change: * Add option for concurrent patch downloads (--threads=NUM) It's a rather big change in code actually - I've finally integrated the patch by Chris Reece which he made available at: http://www.sparsezone.com/pca/ It add

Re: [pca] Patch 125952-07

2008-04-17 Thread Jones, Dave
Thanks for all the feedback guys. I'm running U3 here; I've already opened a case with Sun and made them aware of the issue. Perhaps it will help. Mahalo! Dave -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Paul Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008