Allen Eastwood wrote:
Really, Sun needs to update 137137-09 to have 126419 as a required
patch.
As far as I know, Sun won't publish new revisions of kernel patches
which have been superseded by a new kernel patch.
What they've done in the past is to publish a new revision of one of the
patc
Norman Lyon wrote:
Wait Can't we just drop the '.$ARCH' concern and look at the REV=
part of the VERSION? From my initial checking, I'm seeing that the
multiple package names are showing up with different versions...
Seems as if we're getting to the very core of the problem. You are
I usually use Live Upgrade with PCA but LU isn't quite there with the
new boot archive. Quite often you need to run bootadm update-archive
against the alternate LU root manually in order to have a bootable
environment and put up with a spurious update-archive in the live
environment because some p
I see what you see in S9 and S10. I don't care about S8, but the
story is a tad more complex with more than just 2 architectures
(sun4[dmu]).
BUT, what I'm seeing, at least in 9 and 10, is that (at least with the
patches in the EIS bundles), if different architectures share a common
pack
