Thanks for the info, Billy was able to supply me with a couple but if
anyone has them I'd like to get the patchdiags from September 1st, October
1st and November 1st.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Martin Paul
wrote:
> Am 01.12.2014 18:43, schrieb Tim Hosfelt:
>
>> Is there a way to get older p
Am 01.12.2014 18:43, schrieb Tim Hosfelt:
Is there a way to get older patchdiag.xref files from Oracle - I'd like to
get ones from early to mid September and October.
No, unfortunately Oracle doesn't provide an archive. Many PCA users do
so, though, so if you post specific dates here I'm sure
From: pca [mailto:pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at] On Behalf Of Tim Hosfelt
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 11:43 AM
To: pca@lists.univie.ac.at
Subject: [pca] patchdiag.xref
Is there a way to get older patchdiag.xref files from Oracle - I'd like to get
ones from early to mid September and Oc
Is there a way to get older patchdiag.xref files from Oracle - I'd like to
get ones from early to mid September and October.
Am 22.07.2013 10:42, schrieb Jan Holzhueter:
seems like the patchdiag.xref download is broken atm.
I didn't try it in the last 72 hours, but as of now it seems to work again.
Martin.
Hi,
Same problem since july 19
Daniel
-Message d'origine-
De : pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at [mailto:pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at] De
la part de Jan Holzhueter
Envoyé : lundi 22 juillet 2013 10:43
À : PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
Objet : [pca] patchdiag.xref download b
Hi,
seems like the patchdiag.xref download is broken atm.
./pca.perl -l -V
Option list: 1
Option patchdir: /home/jh/patches/.
Option debug: 1
Command: ./pca.perl
ARGV: missing
Version: 20120829-01
CWD: /home/jh/patches
Found /usr/sfw/bin/wget (1.12, 11200, https)
Found /usr/bin/wget (1.12, 11200,
ok...@towerswatson.com
-Original Message-
From: pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at [mailto:pca-boun...@lists.univie.ac.at] On
Behalf Of Martin Paul
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 7:22 AM
To: PCA (Patch Check Advanced) Discussion
Subject: Re: [pca] patchdiag.xref changes broken for 2 days.
Am 21.02.2013 1
Am 21.02.2013 16:38, schrieb Brookins, Neil (Philadelphia):
I've been closely watching the daily changes in the patchdiag.xref in
the past 2 weeks. I've found a serious problem that will result in
PCA not applying patches that should be applied if certain versions
of patchdiag.xref are used.
Co
I've been closely watching the daily changes in the patchdiag.xref in the past
2 weeks.
I've found a serious problem that will result in PCA not applying patches that
should be applied if certain versions of patchdiag.xref are used.
This is a timing/race issue where recommended patches are remove
Hi Martin,
I followed up with the team that generates patchdiag on Friday.
There was a recent code change to better handle EOL patches that
triggered the issue you reported on Friday.
All should be fixed now.
Best,
-Don
On 03/10/11 08
Don O'Malley wrote:
That said, something has happened to trigger 119081-25 being marked as obsolete
(I suspect this is a result of an internal process).
In the current patchdiag.xref (Oct/02/11) the state of 119081-25 has been
reverted to active (not obsolete) again. Same for the other 7 patch
Hi Martin,
I'll investigate.
In a nutshell the relationship between patches 119081-25 &
124628-14 is that patch 119081-xx was rejuvenated into patch 124628-xx.
Patch rejuvenation is explained a the top of
http://blogs.oracle.com/patch/entry/solaris_10_kernel_patchid_progression
That said, so
In today's patchdiag.xref, patch 119081-25 is suddenly marked as "Obsolete". nut
there is no sign by which patch it would have been obsoleted: usually, the
synopsis (last column in xref file) contains a note "Obsoleted by xx-xx".
As there are two patches which require 119081-25 (namely 1246
Hi,
I do maintain a 'patchdiag.xref wishlist' myself too :-)
I know that it's not that simple, but this sounds like Santa Claus writing a
letter to himself! :)
- patch size (zipped/unzipped)
I have this on my list (definitely the zipped filesize anyway).
The size of the unzipped patch
Sorry for the delay replying to this mail...
I do maintain a 'patchdiag.xref wishlist' myself too :-)
On 08/09/11 08:59, Martin Paul wrote:
dpecka
wrote:
i'm suggesting to think about these
fields:
- patch bundle
This would be a massive file, maybe 10-20 times the size of the current
patchdiag.xref. What about an online version, using some sort of database?
Put in a date as a parameter and it returns the patchdiag.xref
constructed for that date? Or a patch number and you get the whole
history for that
Thomas,
I wonder if this feature could be integrated into We Sun Solve website,
as from the patchdiag.xref archive, I could generate a patchdiag.xref with
latest revision as base and then add older revision of patches into it by
looking at
patchdiag.xref archive.
Yes, you're right. Theoretica
Martin,
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:59:27 +0200
Martin Paul wrote:
> - include all patch revisions, not just the latest
I wonder if this feature could be integrated into We Sun Solve website,
as from the patchdiag.xref archive, I could generate a patchdiag.xref with
latest revision as base and then
dpecka wrote:
i'm suggesting to think about these fields:
- patch bundle
- readme md5sum
- zipped patch md5sum
I'll add these from my wishlist:
- patch properties (rebootafter, etc.)
- patch size (zipped/unzipped)
- a new flag "always install first" for the patch utilities patches etc.
- incl
hello Don, hello boys
isn't possible to incorporate in patchdiag.xref as a new field some kind
of info if that patch is also shipped with patch some bundle ?
well, i know that it's not so easy hence the releases increment but just
think about it.
i'm suggesting to think about these fields:
- pa
Anything before september 2008 would interest me!
You can consult eventual gaps in the archive there:
http://wesunsolve.net/patchdiag
the drop down list is containing every archive I have.
Thanks to all!
Thomas
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:02:49 -0400
Rajiv Gunja wrote:
> So which year Xref are yo
So which year Xref are you looking for?
I can share 2009 (233) and some of 2008(78).
Let me know. Thanks
-GGR
--
Rajiv G Gunja
Blog: http://ossrocks.blogspot.com
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:31, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> > Dennis,
> >
> > This is ok for theses one, I already got them all ;)
> >
> Dennis,
>
> This is ok for theses one, I already got them all ;)
> I thought you had more xrefs from earlier than 2009 ;)
>
>
Well, I do but I will have to go get a backup tape from .. somewhere.
--
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x1D936C72FA35B44B
+-
Dennis,
This is ok for theses one, I already got them all ;)
I thought you had more xrefs from earlier than 2009 ;)
Thanks anyway !
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 08:13:59 -0400 (EDT)
Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> > Nothing received yet,
> >
> > Do you need a FTP server if the file is big so you can upload
> Nothing received yet,
>
> Do you need a FTP server if the file is big so you can upload it ?
>
No. I just have not gotten around to it :-)
I don't have a huge stack of them .. but a few :
# ls $PCA_XREFDIR
getupdates.pem
patchdiag.CHECKSUMS
patchdiag.CHECKSUMS.old
patchdiag.CHECKSUMS_05_May_2
Nothing received yet,
Do you need a FTP server if the file is big so you can upload it ?
Regards,
Thomas
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 01:21:34 -0400 (EDT)
Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> > Hello world!
> >
> > As Martin advised me to ask directly on the whole list, I'm there!
> > I'm building an online arch
> Hello world!
>
> As Martin advised me to ask directly on the whole list, I'm there!
> I'm building an online archives of old patchdiag.xref
> (http://wesunsolve.net/patchdiag)
> and thus, I've collected some patchdiags that various people gave me.
>
> If you have missing patchdiag's (older ones)
Hello world!
As Martin advised me to ask directly on the whole list, I'm there!
I'm building an online archives of old patchdiag.xref
(http://wesunsolve.net/patchdiag)
and thus, I've collected some patchdiags that various people gave me.
If you have missing patchdiag's (older ones), theses could
Don O'Malley wrote:
Hi Martin,
When we first migrated patch metadata to MOS (in June 2009) we
never included metadata for patches for products that were EOSL.
That should be June 2010!
As part of the recent MOS 5.3 release we have aligned patchdiag.xref
with the metadata available fr
Hi Martin,
When we first migrated patch metadata to MOS (in June 2009) we
never included metadata for patches for products that were EOSL.
As part of the recent MOS 5.3 release we have aligned patchdiag.xref
with the metadata available from MOS.
All of the patches that have disappeared have
With today's patchdiag.xref ("AS OF Jul/12/11") many patches have disappeared
from the file.
At a quick glance, it seems that it affects patches for old Solaris versions (up
to Solaris 7), patches for old unbundled software and nearly all of the over
5000 unbundled "PTF/RMLS" patches. There ar
Martin,
It's called the Ops Center (or UCE) Knowledge Base, for which you have spend
large sums of money. And then it isn't always right either.
John
Maybe these guys can build and host it:
http://sunsolve.espix.org/
They seem to be bringing back all the patch research functionality we lost
when Oracle shutdown Sunsolve.
Hopefully they don't get sued into oblivion, but since they don't host the
patches, just point to them in MOS, they are pro
Jeff wrote:
A new procedure
would have pca download a copy of 144488-11, grab the dependency info from
within the zip, replace the info in a temporary patchdiag.xref, and then do
the normal dependency checks.
Not that I wouldn't have thought about that before :)
I'm not sure how practical it w
Something that comes to mind as a good use for this if it were integrated
into pca is a way to get around the problems associated with specifying a
version of a patch that isn't in the current patchdiag.xref.
As an example, say I want to install a back revision of the kernel patch,
144488-11. Curr
Jeff,
Thanks a lot for giving the script a try and reporting the results. I'm
surprised that it worked so fine on the first attempt. Using it with the Update
cluster is an interesting application, too - good idea!
I have now put the mkxref script on the "Contrib" section of the PCA webpage. I
OK, I tested this and it works great. Using the patchdiag created from the
CPU, I was able to download, install and reboot the server in the amount of
time it would take me to copy the 2GB tarball and start extracting it, and
instead of having to try installing each of the 200+ patches like the
in
Just to add another thought. Another great use for this would be with the
bundles that are created to patch to a update level rather then doing a
LiveUpgrade.
I'll try it against the Update 9 patch bundle and see what happens.
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Jeff wrote:
> This is awesome Mart
This is awesome Martin, my guess is it might make a patchdiag file more
accurate then the real one since it would use the info that patchadd would
use to decide if it needs to be installed.
I'll give it a test and see if the results match if I installed the CPU from
the bundled install scripts, bu
By the way, for some reason, April 10th 2009 was the last valid Sol 8 Xref
file I can use.
If you want that, I can send it over.
-GGR
--
Rajiv G Gunja
Blog: http://ossrocks.blogspot.com
2011/4/8 İhsan Doğan
> On 04/ 8/11 09:00 AM, İhsan Doğan wrote:
>
> Solaris 8 entered EOL phase 2 by 1st A
On 04/ 8/11 09:00 AM, İhsan Doğan wrote:
Solaris 8 entered EOL phase 2 by 1st April 2009. Does anybody still have
a patchdiag.xref from March 2009, where all the Solaris 8 Patches can be
downloaded with a regular support contract?
Thanks to everybody who have sent me the file so quickly.
I
Hi,
Solaris 8 entered EOL phase 2 by 1st April 2009. Does anybody still have
a patchdiag.xref from March 2009, where all the Solaris 8 Patches can be
downloaded with a regular support contract?
Ihsan
--
ih...@dogan.ch http://blog.dogan.ch/
Martin Paul wrote:
I've been asked for a copy of patchdiag.xref from the date before the
Solaris 8 Vintage support has been introduced. I don't have one myself,
can anybody provide a copy (by personal e-mail)?
Got it, thanks to Dagobert and Rajiv!
Martin.
I've been asked for a copy of patchdiag.xref from the date before the
Solaris 8 Vintage support has been introduced. I don't have one myself,
can anybody provide a copy (by personal e-mail)?
I guess there should be a:
## PATCHDIAG TOOL CROSS-REFERENCE FILE AS OF Mar/31/09 ##
but anything a
On Jun 28, 2010, at 2:19 AM, Cromwell, Ray, VF-IE wrote:
> from now on I am
> going to create a script
> that will keep a repository of files …
Good idea.
I have something like the following in a shell script that gets launched by
cron every day….
mailto=sysad...@example.com
export SOLARIS
Ray,
## PATCHDIAG TOOL CROSS-REFERENCE FILE AS OF May/27/10 ##
I would like to move to the patchdiag.xref that has revision 12 .
(142900-12)
I have a copy of the file "AS OF May/31/10", which seems to be the one
where 142900-12 showed up for the first time - I'll send you a copy in a
priv
Hi ,
I have a problem with a kernel patch that is very buggy , 142900-11 .
I am using diag file -->
## PATCHDIAG TOOL CROSS-REFERENCE FILE AS OF May/27/10 ##
I would like to move to the patchdiag.xref that has revision 12 .
(142900-12)
Does anybody keep copies of patchdiag.xref files ,
Hi All,
The patchdiag.xref file is up to date again.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Best,
-Don
Don O'Malley wrote:
I'll follow up...
Best,
-Don
Martin Paul wrote:
Just FYI - it seems as if updates to the patchdiag.xref have been
suspended once again. The most recent file I get is:
## PAT
I'll follow up...
Best,
-Don
Martin Paul wrote:
Just FYI - it seems as if updates to the patchdiag.xref have been
suspended once again. The most recent file I get is:
## PATCHDIAG TOOL CROSS-REFERENCE FILE AS OF Mar/20/09 ##
Martin.
Just FYI - it seems as if updates to the patchdiag.xref have been
suspended once again. The most recent file I get is:
## PATCHDIAG TOOL CROSS-REFERENCE FILE AS OF Mar/20/09 ##
Martin.
Laurent Blume wrote:
I've noticed that patchdiag.xref hasn't been updated in a week, and
wondered if it's related to the planned changes:
Updates to patchdiag.xref are still stuck. Sun knows about it, and the
SunSolve team are looking into the underlying issue. That's all the
information I go
Glen Gunselman
Systems Software Specialist
TCS
Emporia State University
>>> Laurent Blume [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/15/2008 10:46 AM >> ( mailto:[EMAIL
>>> PROTECTED]> )
> Yes, I've heard about it, as far as I remember, it's about the ZFS boot,
> right? Trouble to downgrade after installing U6,
Glen Gunselman a écrit :
> I heard there was at least one show stopper bug found in U6. Do you
> know if the 27th date takes that into account?
Yes, I've heard about it, as far as I remember, it's about the ZFS boot,
right? Trouble to downgrade after installing U6, if it's needed. They're
working
>>> Laurent Blume [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/15/2008 7:13 AM >> ( mailto:[EMAIL
>>> PROTECTED]> )
...
> The date I've heard for U6, from Sun people, is 27th.
I heard there was at least one show stopper bug found in U6. Do you know if
the 27th date takes that into account?
Glen Gunselman
Sys
Andy Fiddaman a écrit :
> I'd assumed it was due to Solaris 10u6 being very imminent (this week
> hopefully!). That's also presumably why there have only been half a
> dozen Solaris 10 patches over the last month.
I thought so for the first few days, but don't forget there are also all
other versi
Laurent Blume wrote:
With the release of SunSolve in October 2008, ...
This sounds like a bigger change on sunsolve.sun.com, so this really
might be the root cause. I've sent a message to Gerry Haskins, but he's
currently out of the office.
Thanks for the link to the InfoDoc - I didn't
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008, Laurent Blume wrote:
; Hi all,
;
; I've noticed that patchdiag.xref hasn't been updated in a week, and
; wondered if it's related to the planned changes:
I'd assumed it was due to Solaris 10u6 being very imminent (this week
hopefully!). That's also presumably why there have
Hi all,
I've noticed that patchdiag.xref hasn't been updated in a week, and
wondered if it's related to the planned changes:
«October 2008 - html tags will be removed
In March 2008, html tags were added to the beginning and end of
patchdiag.xref. The tags were introduced to resolve a proble
Hello,
Thank you all for sending me you patchdiag files. I have the files from
those 2 days I want.
I have started archive all new patchdiag.xref files released by SUN.
If anyone needs from a particular date to comply with their OS or company
needs, please drop me a line.
Thanks
-GGR
---
Rajiv
Hello,
This might come across as a strange request:
If anyone has archived their patchdiag.xref file from SUN, I need this file
at two different dates:
1. Around Feb 28th 2008
2. Around May 31st 2008
Thanks in advance.
-GGR
---
Rajiv G Gunja
61 matches
Mail list logo
