Re: [Pce] Update to PCE-Yang (draft-pkd-pce-pcep-yang-02)

WG, As suggested in the WG session today related to PCEP-Yang, here are few pointers on the next step - (1) Use of Features - Use features for any PCEP extn after RFC 5440 - Look out for optional features in RFC5440 - At the same time should not try to have too many features (2) Stateful PCE as

Re: [Pce] Comment on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01

I fully agree with the comments and thanks Jon for bringing it up. We will work to address it. Regards, Jeff On Mar 25, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Dhruv Dhody mailto:dhruv.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1, I agree with Jon. Perhaps a new METRIC type for MSD? Regards, Dhruv On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:23 PM,

Re: [Pce] Comment on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01

+1, I agree with Jon. Perhaps a new METRIC type for MSD? Regards, Dhruv On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Jonathan Hardwick < jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote: > Hi Jeff > > > > I just wanted to clarify the comment that I made at the mic today as we > seemed to be talking at cross-purpo

[Pce] Comment on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01

Hi Jeff I just wanted to clarify the comment that I made at the mic today as we seemed to be talking at cross-purposes. The draft sets a maximum SID depth in the Open message, which effectively creates an implicit constraint on all queries that are sent over the PCEP session, such that returne

[Pce] PCE as a Central Controller

Hi, We couldn't get a chance to present in the WG, because of the excellent discussion about DetNet. BTW, here is the link to the slides: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/slides/slides-92-pce-3.pdf Do find me in the hallways or offline if this work strikes your fancy! And I can manage to show

Re: [Pce] Minutes of the SFC Control Plane side meeting

FYI. This is related to control of Service Function Path establishment The relevant draft in PCE is draft-wu-pce-traffic-steering-sfc. -Qin 发件人: sfc [mailto:sfc-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Linda Dunbar 发送时间: 2015年3月25日 23:43 收件人: s...@ie