Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-09

2017-01-09 Thread Sureshbr
Yes/Support From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: 06 January 2017 17:21 To: Jonathan Hardwick Cc: draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwi...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandw

[Pce] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-pce-association-group-02.txt

2017-01-09 Thread Zhangxian (Xian)
Hi, PCErs, Just refresh the date to keep it alive. We would like to move this draft forward since this the base draft for many other drafts. So, please review this draft and let us know if you have any comments/suggestions. Cheers, Xian on behalf of the authors/contributors -邮件原

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-association-group-02.txt

2017-01-09 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element of the IETF. Title : PCEP Extensions for Establishing Relationships Between Sets of LSPs Authors : Ina Minei

Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

2017-01-09 Thread Julien Meuric
Hi, This topic was tackled a while ago in the context of draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/wn4gGwZnTZS53pbyg1eCHw3YMVE It looks like the I-D would benefit from clarification on this matter before sending it to the IESG. Authors, what to do you think? Aar

Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

2017-01-09 Thread Jonathan Hardwick
Hi Aaron Thanks. So actually, I need to backtrack and agree that there is a mechanism defined for a backup PCE to request that an orphaned LSP is delegated to it - I had missed that. I am not sure that this implies that the PCC cannot re-delegate of its own free will. It would be useful to h

Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

2017-01-09 Thread Julien Meuric
Hi Aaron, Thank for you comment. As you point out, the current I-D has taken a timer-based approach: - while State Timeout is not expired, decision is at the PCE level, any PCE with ID knowledge may claim control (not necessarily granted); - once State Timeout is expired, the PCC gets the decisio

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-09

2017-01-09 Thread Ravi Singh
Hi Yes/support (co-author). Regards Ravi From: Rakesh Gandhi [mailto:rgandhi.i...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017 2:25 PM To: Jonathan Hardwick ; luyu...@gmail.com; Ravi Singh ; udayasree.pa...@huawei.com; Dhruv Dhody ; leeyo...@huawei.com; Zhangxian (Xian) ; kin...@tencent.com Cc:

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-09

2017-01-09 Thread Rakesh Gandhi
Hi, Yes/support (as a co-author). Thanks, Rakesh On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:24 AM, Jonathan Hardwick < jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote: > All, > > > > This is start of a two week poll on making > draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-09 > a PCE working group document. > > https:/