Hi Julien,
Thanks for your detailed review and providing suggested text.
Here is the working copy -
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-association-group-08.txt
Diff -
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-association-group-06&url2=https
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
Title : Applicability of the Path Computation Element (PCE)
to the Abstraction and Control of TE Networks (ACTN)
Au
Hi Adrian, WG,
We have posted a new version -09 that addresses WG LC comments (from Adrian and
Dan).
I-D: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn/
Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn-09
Please have a look and let us know if any
Hi Dhruv,
Congratulation from the prompt update. I'm fine with the notation
for ranges.
The only open issue is the text you add below:
- Is there a reason to prohibit, for a given Association type, split
operator-configured ranges? I don't think this is what the original
version suggested.
- Ass
Hi Julien,
My bad!
I did some digging and we added this based on Adrian's comment [1] back in
Feb last year (and my memory failed me).
How about -
The Assoc-type MAY appear more than once in the OP-CONF-ASSOC-RANGE
TLV in the case of a non-contiguous Operator-configured Association
Rang
Yes/support
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Mar 7, 2019, at 1:35 AM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian, WG,
>
> We have posted a new version -09 that addresses WG LC comments (from Adrian
> and Dan).
>
> I-D: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn/
> Diff: https://www.ietf.org
This sentence is clear enough to address my concern.
Thank you!
Julien
On 07/03/2019 15:00, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> My bad!
> I did some digging and we added this based on Adrian's comment [1]
> back in Feb last year (and my memory failed me).
>
> How about -
>
> The Assoc-ty
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
Title : PCEP Extensions for Establishing Relationships
Between Sets of LSPs
Authors : Ina Minei
Hi,
Thanks for this revision which is practically perfect.
Sadly, the RFC Editor requires that the first section of a document is the
Introduction. I think it would be fine to swap your sections 1 and 2.
You asked me at the end of February to have a look at your proposed Security
text, and I hav
Hi authors,
Unless I am mistaken, there was never a response to my review back in
December. Did it get lost (I see it in the list archive)?
Plans?
Thanks,
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Farrel
Sent: 05 December 2018 18:17
To: 'Leeyoung' ; 'pce@ietf.org'
Subject: RE: [Pce] I-D
Hi Adrian,
Please take my/our apology for the delayed response. I am working on it now,
hopefully we can upload the revision either today or by tomorrow.
Thanks.
Young
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 4:15 PM
To: draft-i
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
Title : Path Computation Element (PCE) Protocol Extensions
for Stateful PCE Usage in GMPLS-controlled Networks
Auth
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
Title : Applicability of the Path Computation Element (PCE)
to the Abstraction and Control of TE Networks (ACTN)
Au
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
Title : PCEP Extension for Native IP Network
Authors : Aijun Wang
Boris Khasanov
14 matches
Mail list logo
