Hi Tom,
The question lies in today's context. If the context was to change much
in the future, we could of course reconsider the situation based on the
new elements we'd face.
As a result, you're clearly voicing for option a.
Thank you,
Julien
On 30/09/2022 09:25, tom petch wrote:
Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-11: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Hi,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Sep 26, 2022, at 20:19, Hariharan Ananthakrishnan wrote:
>
> I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
> in accordance with
From: Pce on behalf of julien.meu...@orange.com
Sent: 29 September 2022 09:37
Dear PCE WG,
Let's follow up on the discussion started during IETF 114 about
draft-koldychev-pce-operational [1]. The I-D currently tackles different
issues about PCEP, some of them being informational, some other
